Electricity popularized for centuries why electric cars are called new energy

Are 100-year-old electric cars in conflict with new energy?

Many people think that new energy has a history of 100 years, according to its age and its self-predicted life cycle as a reference, it seems that this is a kind of "old" energy, but understand the "age" of conventional energy.

Nounscripts

Noun: new energy_NE means new energy. This is different from the definition of conventional energy, which refers to chemical fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, and other sources of energy that are burned to produce heat, which can be used for lighting, cooking, or converted into mechanical energy.

These sources of energy have been around since the quasi-era of "slash-and-burn" agriculture. Archaeology does not yet have a precise definition, but it is generally accepted that humans began utilizing fire 1 million years ago, which is the starting point for conventional energy. Conventional energy has a history of one million years, while new energy is only a few hundred years old, so is it not true that "electricity" is much younger? The definition of "new energy" should not be controversial anymore.

However, the definition of a new energy source is not really based on "age" to differentiate between the two, but rather on whether it can be artificially produced, which is called "renewable"! Conventional energy sources such as coal, oil and natural gas are not renewable, and the common description is to use some less, until they are used up. The storage capacity of oil has been less than 200 billion tons, while the average annual consumption of the global automobile has exceeded 5.7 billion tons, counting how many years oil can still burn it.

Second, new energy renewability

Wind energy_won't dry up

Hydroelectric energy_won't dry up

Photovoltaic energy_won't disappear

Geothermal energy_won't cool down

Oceanic energy has infinite potential

These energies come from the universe, and as long as the universe doesn't return to the singularity it will be able to harness this energy for eternity. However, compared to the life of the universe, the cycle of civilization is a "flash in the pan"; time is a different concept in different dimensions, and a long human civilization may only be a snap of the fingers in a higher dimension, so there is still the potential to utilize these energies efficiently through technological upgrades, and these energies generally share a ****ing common denominator.

These energies all come from the universe, and as long as the universe doesn't return to a singularity it will be able to utilize these energies for eternity. However, compared to the life of the universe, the life cycle of civilization is a "flash in the pan" is not an overstatement; time has different concepts in different dimensions, and a long human civilization may only be a snap of the fingers in a higher dimension, so there is still potential to effectively utilize these energies through technological upgrades, and these energies generally have a **** the same point.

Wind, water, light, and heat can't be directly converted into "kinetic energy" for automobiles, because there is no efficient "wind engine" or "photovoltaic engine", and hydroelectricity and geothermal heat can't be directly converted into power for automobiles. So this energy has to be converted into an energy source that can be used by the car, and analyzing all types of engines - only electric motors can be an alternative option, so this natural energy has to be converted into electricity.

And wind, water, heat can be converted into electricity through mechanical energy, photovoltaic power generation is no problem. So on the premise that these forms of energy are called new energy, and the ultimate form of new energy is electricity, why isn't an electric car a new energy vehicle?

Knowledge: electric vehicles equipped with power batteries can be utilized step by step, the concept of the car as a power battery about ten years after the use of the elimination of batteries can be sorted and tested, picked out the vast majority of the new energy power generation to the field of expansion of the energy storage power plant. At this stage, the proportion of new energy generation is only more than 30%, the reason for the slow improvement is that the construction cost of energy storage power station is too high, to put it bluntly, the battery is too expensive.

But the use of these automobile batteries can significantly reduce the cost, and the life cycle of 30/50 years. The popularity of electric cars could drive the growth of new energy generation, so it seems appropriate that such cars are defined as new energy vehicles, think about it. FYI: High-speed trains are motorized, as are submarines and many ships, and electric motors are very powerful.