Revitalization of northeastern economic development why deepen the reform of government management system

The government has an important historical mission in promoting the revitalization of the old industrial base. Promoting the reform of the administrative system focuses on transforming government functions, effectively playing the role of the government, and improving the government's administrative capacity. But to give full play to the role of the government, must speed up the reform of the government system as a prerequisite. Because the old industrial base in Northeast China is the earliest to enter, the latest to exit, the implementation of the most thoroughly planned economy. At present, the biggest problem of the old industrial base is that it is y influenced by the traditional planned economy system, and the system reform is relatively lagging behind, especially the government reform and state-owned enterprise reform is relatively lagging behind. Therefore, the revitalization of old industrial bases must first strengthen the innovation of institutional mechanisms and eliminate institutional obstacles. Only by accelerating the government's own reform, better role positioning, change government functions, in order to improve the government's administrative capacity.

The last round of revitalization of the beginning, China just joined the WTO. people talked about, into the WTO, first of all, there is a government into the problem, because the WTO rules are almost all the regulation of the government. Here we are talking about, into the market, there is also a government into the market problem, because the market economy requires the establishment and improvement of the market system as the goal, adjust and regulate the government's administrative functions.

In recent years, northeastern governments at all levels to strengthen social management and public **** service functions, and actively from omnipotent, regulatory to management, service-oriented, rule of law, government functions have undergone positive changes in many aspects, and achieved great results. First, the cultivation, standardization and regulation of the market system has made some progress, on the basis of the continuous development of the commodity market, and gradually cultivate the market for factors of production, and strive to establish a unified, open, competitive and orderly market system, and the fundamental role of the market in the allocation of resources is becoming more and more significant. Secondly, the separation of government and enterprises has made great strides, with government departments dissolving their administrative affiliation with the economic entities they run and the enterprises directly under them, and no longer directly managing enterprises. Thirdly, the Government has gradually moved closer to international practice in the management of the foreign-related economy. Fourth, the Government's function of promoting coordinated economic and social development has been strengthened. Fifth, the government has made some progress in reforming itself, establishing a strategy of governing the province and administering the country according to law, putting forward the goal of establishing a clean, diligent, pragmatic and efficient government and striving to put it into practice, gradually deepening the reform of governmental institutions, and moving forward the process of political democratization.

On the whole, the reform of the government system is still lagging behind the process of economic transformation, the transformation of government functions is also slower than the requirements of the development of the market economy, in the relationship between the government and enterprises, the government and the market, the government and society, a series of deep-rooted contradictions have yet to be resolved. Problems in the administrative system has become a bottleneck restricting economic and social development, affecting the implementation of revitalization policies. Specifically, it is "three strong and three weak":

Strong government, weak enterprises

Government's direct intervention in the micro-entities, especially state-owned enterprises is still too much, effective state-owned asset management system has not yet been formed, the government's public **** management functions and the functions of the state-owned asset owners confuse the situation has not been changed fundamentally. There has been no fundamental change. The government and enterprises are not separated, and the government serves the dual functions of referee and athlete, taking over the management and operation of enterprises. The government has not yet completely freed itself from enterprise activities, and administrative intervention still exists in some areas, such as administrative control and support for state-owned enterprises by means of fiscal and tax returns and subsidized interest rates. The administrative approval system formed during the period of planned economy and somewhat expanded during the period of economic transition still exists widely, especially in the areas of enterprise establishment, appointment and dismissal of leaders, investment, foreign trade and other areas of administrative approval need to be cleaned up and cut down urgently. In the process of promoting the reform of state-owned enterprises, the implementation of certain policies has had the side effect of strengthening administrative approval and case-by-case handling. In the process of restructuring the shareholding system of state-owned enterprises, stock issuance and mergers and acquisitions and other asset reorganization activities, some departments and local governments tend to intervene inappropriately in enterprises out of departmental interests, local interests or even the will of the chief. Supporting state-owned enterprises by means of financial rebates and interest subsidies, rather than by means of state capital investment and operation. Forcing enterprises with good efficiency to take care of disadvantaged enterprises in terms of investment, guaranteed loans, asset reorganization, etc., and even amortizing government administrative expenditures to enterprises. Enterprise cadres and government cadres have the same administrative level and can be transferred to each other. As a micro-economic cell of the state-owned enterprises, to take over a large number of social affairs, enterprises are eager to slim down, overburdened, unable to cope with the fierce competition in the market. State-owned enterprises are dominant on one side, while private enterprises are seriously weak. There are still too many restrictions on the non-public economy, and a level playing field has yet to be formed. The result of strong government and weak enterprises is that the government, enterprises and people are all trapped in a predicament: state-owned enterprises are increasingly in trouble due to unresolved institutional conflicts, low degree of marketization, lack of vitality in development, and inability to converge with the market. And private enterprises have been growing, resulting in a large number of laid-off workers can not be diverted to resettlement, the local economy is difficult to see improvement.

Strong government, weak market

Long accustomed to the top-down management of administrative power, with directive preferences and administrative orders to intervene in the economy, the lack of modern market management concept. There is no real understanding and belief in the role of the market mechanism, is still overly superstitious administrative power, adhere to the executive-led, preference for direct organization of production and business activities, direct organization of investment and project implementation, direct direct directive economic indicators and product indicators, directly through the administrative order to intervene in economic life.

The market can play a role in the place, the government's administrative intervention is the most concentrated; and market failure, but the blind spot of government management. Regional economic development, in the "artificial intervention" state, from foreign investment (investment has become the government's main work), to promote enterprise joint ventures, to the project, laying new enterprises and even organize exhibitions and trade talks, are hosted by the government and promote. In the field of investment and financing, there is a tendency for the government to directly intervene in micro-investment and financing activities to achieve the macro-control objectives, the results of which often do not meet the expected purpose of macro-control, while at the same time strengthened the government's investment and financing activities of the abnormal intervention. Many departments and local governments are still too much to assume the functions of the main body of investment and financing, spend a lot of energy to compete for funds, projects, investment decisions rely on layers of administrative organs for approval, not according to scientific rigor, market-oriented investment decision-making procedures, the lack of strict investment risk responsibility mechanism, repeatedly resulting in major investment blunders. The government has become the main body of the allocation of resources, the market mechanism to play a role too small or not play a role. Entrepreneurs say: "The Northeast gives the outside world the impression that the government-led market, not the market of entrepreneurs." Many things that should not have been done by the government, the government is doing, and some things that should have been done by the government, the government and due to the lack of energy and financial resources, not enough or did not do.

In the market supervision, on the one hand, the laws and regulations to regulate the market order is still not sound, the regulations are not uniform, not transparent, according to the law of the management system is still very imperfect, there are many blank spots. Legislation lags behind the reality, law enforcement lags behind legislation. There is a lack of strong supervision and control over the lack of compliance with the law, lax law enforcement and even impunity, and the phenomenon of the rule of man outweighing the rule of law occurs in many places, seriously undermining the independence of the judiciary and judicial impartiality. There are contradictions between departmental and local government regulations and even internal documents and national laws. In the practice of administrative law enforcement, the authority of internal documents is greater than that of departmental regulations, and the authority of departmental regulations is greater than that of national laws. On the other hand, local protectionism and sectoral divisions are constantly changing their tactics, hindering the formation of a unified regional market. These factors have led to a relatively chaotic market order, highlighted by the proliferation of counterfeit and shoddy goods, rampant tax evasion, tax fraud, fraudulent remittance and smuggling activities, disorganized social credit relations, the phenomenon of debt evasion is quite common, and the construction field of falsehoods and fraudulent, poor quality of the project is a serious problem. This "economy of man" concept and "command" mode of management and the structure of the diversified market economy is no longer compatible.

Strong government, weak society

From the relationship between the government and society, the government has overrun most of the social affairs, social governance is not developed, the government decentralization is not enough, the intermediary institutions are dependent on the government departments, making the intermediary institutions are not like the development of the real social intermediary organizations to meet the requirements of the development of the market economy is not fully developed. The government in the exercise of functions in the process of a certain degree of the existence of the problem of overstepping, lack of position and misplaced. "Offside" is that the government directly manage economic affairs; "lack of" is that the government public **** service function has not been given full play; "misalignment" is that the government is busy with micro affairs, macro Coordination is not effective. In the relationship between the government and intermediary organizations, on the one hand, to cultivate and play the role of intermediary organizations is not enough, on the other hand, the implementation of its supervision in accordance with the law is not enough. Scientific research units have stagnated in the restructuring, the reform of institutions lagging behind, to perform a large number of administrative functions; often a large commission, office and bureau, there are several or even more than a dozen institutions.

So, the old industrial base administrative system is mainly a problem of misalignment of functions is prominent. The main manifestation of the political capital is not divided, the political enterprises are not divided, the political affairs are not divided, the political community is not divided. The backwardness of the Northeast is a kind of institutional backwardness, the gap between the Northeast and the southern coastal areas, on the surface of the economic development level of the fall, the essence of the system is the contrast. Reform of the administrative system in the northeast is imperative.