Debate system

In fact, different competitions are suitable for different levels of debaters, different competitions can also show the debaters of different oriented ability, the following is my collection of various debate system, I hope to help you.

First, the World Championships system

My own earliest contact with the system is the World Championships system, the University of Engineering and Technology School Tournament is also this kind of system, the World Championships system is very much biased in favor of the system of the exchange, and is the kind of short exchanges are mainly, whether it's on the defense, a plate of more than one, a defense of the quality of each other, it is easy to speed up the debate through the debate to disrupt the opponent's setup, to the debate, to the debate, to the debate, to the debate, to the debates. To disrupt the opponent's layout of the tournament system, so the World Championships tournament system is very easy to play in the tournament, many of the two sides of the fast back-and-forth, but the World Championships tournament system also has its drawbacks, I think due to the lack of the beginning of the long interrogation, many of the World Championships matches in the regional tournaments are prone to play because of the lack of any **** know how to play the very chaotic, and difficult to play the precise exchanges, but the design of the odd attack to a certain extent to make up for the shortcomings, and the tactical options. It also makes the tactical options more abundant, such as the positive side of the third defense with the odd attack double questioning, the second defense refutation double even and so on.

The new national defense system

The new national defense system is my favorite system, because I think it is designed to be quite suitable for in-depth discussion of the topic, probably because I often play four defense, the new national defense four defense can be the first quality, but also can be free to distribute the time, so it has a better feeling, haha. The main reason is that the new national defense has abandoned the more detailed links and turned them into statements and questions, so it's very easy to clarify the opponent's core viewpoints through questions, and it's also very convenient to explain the problems through statements, and after combining the CDA's free allocation of time, there are also a lot of options on where to place the center of gravity of the game. Short and long speeches and questioning make it easy to advance the game and discuss more complex and deeper topics, so the new national debate often sets up very grand philosophical propositions after the semi-finals, but due to the lack of short exchanges like the World Championships, the new national debate system is actually put into a lot of school tournaments and regional tournaments is actually very easy to make the game very dull.

Three, the old friends tournament system

The old friends tournament system can be said to be an incredibly free tournament system, and I think that this is the most suitable for the old friends to play the tournament system, because you can choose the tactical means is too much, such as a minute of thesis, a single point of argument, five-minute questioning, to hit through the other side of the bottom line, two minutes free debate, speed up the other side and so on. Interference with the other side and so on and so forth, let the masters play this tournament system will make the tournament advance very quickly, and it is easy to play the highlights. However, I personally feel that the quality of the debaters is too high, because this system is very free, at least when I play often do not know what to do in the next session, and the second is to move forward faster, basically I played nine minutes or so I feel that the speakers have spoken, and it is easy to repeat the latter speech, so I participate in the system of the old friend of the tournament in the kind of performance tournament in general is still quite bad.

Fourth, philosophical defense