Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional customs - Argument: Inheritance is more important than innovation. Against: Innovation is more important than inheritance.

Argument: Inheritance is more important than innovation. Against: Innovation is more important than inheritance.

Look at the example first:

If there is only "inheritance" and no "innovation", will human beings still be single-celled creatures?

Nature, any life, any species, if only "inheritance" and no "innovation", will never evolve, nor can it adapt to environmental changes, and will certainly be eliminated.

Similarly, in human society, if there is only inheritance and no innovation, it will be eliminated.

Without innovation, there is no vitality.

It is true that you will always stay in primary school and get 100 every time, but if you are only satisfied with 100 in primary school, you will eventually be eliminated. ...

No matter which era, enterprises can't develop without innovation. If you don't advance, you will retreat

If Microsoft does not continuously introduce a new generation of win system, it will stay in the stage of win95 forever. Do you think it can still lead the trend of computer system now? In my opinion, even survival is a problem. ...

Even an "aircraft carrier" like Microsoft will face sinking without innovation, let alone a small boat.

The above is an example. Let's give each other a "philosophical" thinking question:

Without "innovation", how did the 1 generation come into being?

Every new species is the result of "innovation".

Every new discipline, new company, new concept and new … must be a breakthrough and innovation.

Since there is no breakthrough 1 generation, how can there be two generations and three generations? ...

That is, if there is no "innovation", what should the other party "inherit"