Others advocate a comprehensive restoration of tradition.

Burial is environmentally friendly, and cremation pollutes the air. Burial cremation does not save land. Secondly, cremation is a disrespect for the deceased, so that the deceased can not be buried and will be tossed after death. The living are really inhuman. Therefore, it is necessary to restore burial, and it is also a respect for the deceased.

Well buried, buried after cremation. Especially in far away places, rural people are sent to crematoriums for cremation when they die, and then return to their original places according to local customs. They parked big coffins full of urns in the nave, and monks stayed at home to learn customs. This repetition not only wastes a lot of money, but also does not save any land. What's the use of cremation It will only waste people and money!

The so-called clavicle crushing. Are these vicious words the same as cremation? Besides, are you superstitious about sweeping graves? That is the tradition of the Chinese nation! Is to tell future generations to remember and commemorate their ancestors, why can it last for thousands of years? People can't forget that Ben has no roots!

The main reason is that we have to bury the soil after cremation, which does not save land. Then the air pollution is too serious, and the cremator burns oil, which wastes resources and increases the burden on the people.

Cremation is a violation of the Chinese nation's 5,000-year-old filial piety inheritance, which is difficult for ordinary people to accept. For rural people, it is even more strongly opposed, because cremation has no benefits at all.

Must support! First, the cemetery is full of concrete pouring, which is permanent, which is the greatest damage to the ecology! If it is a burial, as long as no monument is allowed, it will naturally be classified as dust and ecological nature after a hundred years. If cremated, it is a curse and disposal method of the ancients for those who committed heinous crimes: don't die a natural death! How can we respect life if we have no fear of death?

Burial is similar to cremation. The key point is that the cemetery is not allowed to be used. It is built of cement and stone. You can bury it in the soil. After a hundred years, it is almost gone. If the cemetery was built of cement, it would still be there hundreds of years later. If the grave is not allowed to be used, cement stone will do.

I think it's better to be buried in the countryside according to local conditions, because 1 the average income in rural areas is low, which can reduce economic pressure, 2 rural areas have land advantages and 3 can reduce air pollution. If it is an urban hukou, it can be cremated, and it can also be buried in the countryside. At least there is no need to pollute the environment across the board.

Burial is more environmentally friendly and does not occupy land. The land where we live has bred mankind for thousands of years. It stands to reason that there are cemeteries everywhere, but we don't see them everywhere. After three or five generations, rural cemeteries will automatically disappear, some leaving monuments, and some leaving no monuments. Except for the magnificent tombs of emperors and generals, ordinary people can't stay any longer. Now the cemetery is actually occupying land. Once built, it is really occupied. Graveyards of marble and granite will not disappear easily. In addition, the Han people and most countries in the world have always been buried. Cremation was originally used only by Buddhists in China, and other religions, including Christians, were buried.

Freedom of choice is the best, and cremation is also a grave burial, but the disposal methods of bodies are different and the ground is the same. Infectious diseases spread during the transport of corpses. Buried in the ground, how to spread, cremated bodies will be exposed to the air for longer and longer.

There is land to bury in the countryside, and people in that city go there to bury if they have no land. Burying in the countryside is bound to occupy land. It's not that the dead compete with the living for territory. In China, land is scarce, and a tomb covers at least five square meters. How many people will die that year? How much land does it take to make a grave? In the era of building Dazhai land, I don't know how many graves to tear down and how much soil to pick up every year, and I have to level the graves and plant crops. Cremation is free now. When a person dies, the funeral home can put a clean and hygienic urn, which is more convenient.

Burial is a tradition. Thousands of years of burial have never happened in such a large-scale cemetery, especially in Wanshan, Qian Shan, where people can't accept cremation. It stands to reason that burial and cremation are voluntary.

China's traditional culture has flourished for thousands of years, but it's a pity that Wan Dexiao came first, and he died broke. All methods are natural. So personally, I still think that burial is reasonable. The system should be customized, for example, rural areas waste land on tombs, so it should be moderate.

Cremation is practiced in the first, second and third tier cities and their surrounding areas, and people in rural areas, semi-mountainous areas, mountainous areas and hilly areas can freely choose burial methods! The country's compulsory cremation in mountainous, mid-level and hilly areas is not in line with the reality of China!

After cremation in rural areas, there are more disadvantages. When people are cremated after death, it costs a lot of money and is expensive to put the ashes in the urn. Plus transportation costs, * * * will cost a lot of money. After returning home, I bought a coffin and buried it as usual, so I built a grave and occupied the land. In fact, it has been buried in China for thousands of years. The graves of the deceased do not occupy the land forever, and many ancient tombs gradually become flat and return to nature. Many people's houses in our countryside are built on cemeteries, and many ancient tombs have been destroyed by farmland transformation.

Many people spend money on cremation and then bury their ashes in big coffins according to local customs. Isn't this another expense? What a waste! How many times have people been buried in loess since ancient times, but they have not occupied much land. Many graves have been slowly restored to land. Is the cemetery okay?

I am very supportive of this view! The reason is that the custom of rural burial in China has been circulating for thousands of years, and it is not used to letting it accept the funeral way of urban people at once. Secondly, enforcement in rural areas is a waste of people and money. Yi Chan, you have to pay to go to the crematorium. Second, after cremation, rural people will buy coffins instead of cremation? The purchased urn is buried directly, but the ashes are buried after being placed in the coffin. This inadvertently increased the economic burden of farmers, but also increased the economic burden of farmers in some areas that are not surplus but just out of poverty.