Some people say that the Renaissance movement was to promote and inherit the culture of Greece and Rome, and that it was retro rather than innovative. What do you think about this?

When the bourgeoisie first appeared on the stage, its power was relatively weak and it failed to form a complete and mature system of thought, so it needed to use the ideological power of the ancient Greco-Roman culture as a "coat" to fight against the Christian theology of the Middle Ages. In essence, the Renaissance was not only a revival of classical culture, but also an affirmation of human nature, opposition to divinity, opposition to asceticism, opposition to religious bondage, and then demanded the anti-feudal exploitation of the bourgeoisie is a new culture.