Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional customs - "eclecticism" theory
"eclecticism" theory
To provide? Informal and level? The theoretical basis of these weirdos? In ancient times, many couplets were not level. , promote the so-called? Are informal couplets standard? . In ancient times, couplets that don't talk about level did exist, but what proportion did they account for in the vast number of couplets? Marxist dialectical materialism and historical materialism tell us that we should look at the essence and mainstream of things, not just the surface, tributaries or even the last stream of things. A leaf can't see Mount Tai, it must be sitting in the well and watching the sky, and the blind touch the elephant. "CiHai? Binary cloud:? Use sentences with the same number of words and similar syntax to express opposite or related meanings. ? "Lao Tzu said:? No matter whether they are born together or not, it is difficult to bring out the best in each other. Long and short are in phase, high and low are oblique, and sound and sound are in harmony. ? The nature of this duality. In metrical poems, the middle two couplets must be opposite in parts of speech, flat and harmonious, which are called parallel prose and neck couplets. The original definition of couplets goes beyond this. If it is not harmonious, how can we unite? When couplets came into being is still inconclusive, but what is certain is that the art of couplets matured in the Ming Dynasty, hundreds of years later than that of the middle Tang Dynasty when modern poetry matured. The time difference of hundreds of years undoubtedly determines that the basic elements of couplets are restricted by the form of French sentences. Everyone recognizes the first Spring Festival couplets in Chinese history? Qing Yu in the New Year; Jiajie Changchun? Isn't it a typical five-word sentence? This was the case with Meng Yun, the monarch of Shu after the Five Dynasties, but not with Zhu Yuanzhang, the Ming emperor who split the road of life and death with his hands. Cut off the root of right and wrong? Isn't it a typical seven-character quatrain? As for Xu Wei's topic, Sun Confucius Temple Union: Miss the tears of relatives in Wujiang; Looking forward to the emperor's soul returning to Shu, is it miserable? Even if it is placed? The evening festival is getting thinner and thinner? Du Gongbu concentration is not bad at all! Even the combination of five words and seven words, there is no trace of a word: Jie Jin's? The reeds on the wall are top-heavy and shallow; Bamboo shoots in the mountains are thick-skinned and empty-bellied. This is obvious evidence. Which sentence in Sun Ranweng's Daguanlou couplet does not contain poetry and leveling? Examples are numerous.
Some people say that it will certainly not affect the characteristics of couplets. ? This? Informal and level? The narrator's third reason. In this regard, I would like to ask: What are the characteristics of couplets? What are the characteristics of couplets if the law of "ping, ping and he" is removed? Isn't it only? The two couplets are equivalent in words and relative in parts of speech? have you finished? In this way, couplets were born together with poetry, and should be the twin brothers of poetry, not the derivatives of poetry.
Some people say that Pingzuo is only for couplets. Icing on the cake? ,? Can I only manage it? And say? The so-called harmony, in fact, is mostly a coincidence and belongs to a wonderful hand. ? According to my guess, if a person just regards the rule of rank equivalence as a vassal of couplet art means, and thinks it is dispensable and insignificant, even if it is ok? Careless? Two pairs of harmonious works, by no means? Wonderful hand? . Leveling and antithesis are two important elements in the art of couplets, so we must have a well-thought-out plan and give consideration to them at the same time. This can't just rely on? Wonderful hand? Going? Careless? , but must be deliberately pursued! The ancients said, How many roots and whiskers can you break by singing one sentence? ,? Two words for three years, two tears for a song? , not only refined meaning, refined sentences, refined words, but also refined sounds! This kind of reciting and writing system is hard, how to use it? Wonderful hand? A word?
Some people say that even if ancient and modern names are linked, there are only a handful of legitimate people. ? What is this gentleman reading? Minglian? This is very doubtful. Otherwise, such an arbitrary conclusion would never have been reached. What are the couplets about now? Minglian? The concept of is still very vague, often in? Celebrity couplets? With what? Minglian? It is well known that drawing an equal sign between the two, how misleading this misunderstanding has caused to couplets! It should be noted that many celebrities, including politicians, experts and scholars, even poets, writers and professors. , have made outstanding achievements in their respective posts and occupations, but no one can guarantee that they are all-rounders now. Many professors of Chinese Department and many famous writers and poets can't write irregular poems and couplets, but there are more than one or two. Of course, there are indeed many famous artists among them. However, not all celebrities are co-authors of poetry! The most terrible thing is that some people have no attainments in the poetry association, but they insist on pretending to be experts, coquettish, nonsense, graffiti, and come up with some crappy things that are neither degenerate nor donkey nor horse, which are unsightly to read. However, there are also some snobs clamoring for fame and economic benefits. The majority of lovers and beginners of poetry associations, because their attainments are not deep enough and their appraisal level is not high enough, put these? Celebrity? His works are regarded as treasures. This is the so-called contemporary? Minglian? Context and true colors! If you say? Gu Jinlian? ,? Only a handful of people conform to the law? , probably this? Minglian? Right? Besides this so-called? Minglian? I haven't seen much in ancient times, but only in contemporary times. Can't I use it? Gu Jinlian? To sum it up. Couplets, from ancient times to the present, are divided by syntax, including regular and irregular. French couplets, especially those with genuine names, are absolutely illegal! As for the metrical sentence couplets, they are mainly based on prose brushwork. Although the requirements of flat meter are not as strict as those of regular verse, its prosodic points should be as flat as those of regular verse. When sentences alternate, replace sentences? There is no disorder. Can't it be linked because of its right or wrong sentences? Informal and level? Do whatever you want! Try to see the couplets of the statue of Qin Gui and his wife kneeling at Tiyue Temple in Ruan Yuan in Qing Dynasty:? Ahem! What if a servant loses his heart and has a good wife? Hey! Although a woman has a long tongue, she is not an old thief! ? Except for the first sentence of the couplet, which is flat and uneven, all other sentences are flat and uneven. Another example is the Jia Fu Temple couplet inscribed by Changsha Jinshi Li Mengying in Qing Dynasty:? In those days, there was a cry asking who was the best countermeasure for Xijing, and Dong Jiangdu came from behind. Today is a long-term peaceful and stable world. I am happy and safe in the south, and I will always rely on Dr. Qu. ? Trade union division? Dong Jiangdu? 、? Dr. Qu? Apart from two proper nouns, where is the disharmony of balance? Do these two couplets have real meaning? Minglian? , not fake! As can be seen from the above, when the ancients wrote irregular sentences, they were still so strict about following the rules of leveling, not to mention the combination of regular sentences. Of course, it is undeniable that among the real names, ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, it is indeed very rare and very special? Illegal? Who, such as Huang Songlian: Kill Wu Luzhen the year before last, kill last year and kill Song this year; You said Ying Guixin, he said Hong Shuzu, and I said Yuan Shikai! ? The names of the characters listed in couplets are proper nouns, and their plainness cannot be changed. Therefore, it is difficult to blame them because of the situation. Can you summarize this extremely rare and special example? Only a handful of people conform to the law? What?
A gentleman not only criticized couplets, but also attacked the parallel rhyme of modern poetry. Think? Many famous works violate the laws of poetry. There is more? One, three, five? This place has been violated. ? Still promoting this? Violation? Did Mr. Lu Xun say that? Road? . This is really ridiculous. A person who doesn't even understand the essence of couplets should be all? Smash? Don't you think it's too much for a man who dares to teach an axe to teach others how to talk about poetry? China's traditional poetry, divided by genre, originally has two kinds: ancient poetry and modern poetry. Modern poetry, including metrical poems and quatrains, was stereotyped in the middle Tang Dynasty, and its level and even metrical requirements were very strict. Classical poetry is good at simplicity. It is better to avoid metrical sentences than to follow the metrical rules of modern poetry. Before the mid-Tang Dynasty, the rhyme of poetry was not yet mature, and there were many lawless people. After the mid-Tang Dynasty, due to the deliberate pursuit of Gu Zhuo, there appeared more classical poets who did not conform to the rhythm of modern poetry. Mr. Wang Li's "The Law of Chinese Poetry" said: The principle of keeping the ancient style flat is to avoid entering the law. ? There is a great contrast between ancient poetry and modern poetry. This is the most basic and superficial common sense in poetry theory. So-called? One, three, five, two, four, six? , is designed for modern poetry, not about ancient poetry at all. This gentleman moved out of Du Fu? A song written entirely by singing? Poetry, as an attack? One, three, five? Weapons, right? Smash? Your own feet?
Is this gentleman still playing? Great poets such as Li Bai and Du Fu have tried repeatedly? It boils down to. Poetry is illegal? Is it? Elimination? How crazy this international joke is. It's terrible! The author just wants to fabricate charges out of thin air and attack Shimei! Can you thoroughly meter poetry? Smash? What are couplets? Mao Zedong said, China's poetry? You can't beat it in ten thousand years? ! All attempts to destroy China's excellent cultural traditions and take Pyeongtaek's salary from the bottom of the poetry association art can only be wishful thinking! Professor Wu Xiaoru once said in an article about Peking Opera culture. Modern people can write ancient poems or paintings with new ideas and new ways of thinking, but they must pay attention to tradition, rhyme, brushwork and painting, because old-style poems, brushwork and Chinese painting all belong to the category of classical art after all, and we can't start a new stove without deviating from tradition. ? Couplets also belong to the category of classical art, can we deviate from tradition, abandon the principle of leveling and start a new stove?
? Informal and level? It is no accident that this theory is popular in the world, because it is directly related to the health of the world itself. According to the author's preliminary diagnosis, there are probably three types of symptoms:
A sigh? False hand disease? . ? Insider? Experts are also experts. People with this disease don't know much about the basic definition of couplets literature and the basic characteristics of couplets art, but pretend to be experts. At the beginning of getting off the bus, they shouted and even gave orders and bossed around by relying on their important positions. Because he is a fake expert, there is no need to ask questions about couplets. If we open our mouths, we will also be wrong. Where is this symptom? Informal and level? The clinical manifestations are very prominent.
Second? Sour grape disease? . Suffering from this disease, they only have a preliminary understanding of couplets, have a certain interest and want to play. But I am lazy by nature, unwilling to work hard, study theory seriously, study questions respectfully, and study diligently, so I can only stay at a half-baked level forever. I haven't figured it out yet, and I don't want to blame myself Instead, I took the leveling rule as? Chains? For what? Cuff? And shut it out of the couplets art hall.
March? Show off? . People suffering from this disease may know more when they see couplet art for the first time. But in the end, due to the lack of academic qualifications and talents, I can't speak much in theory, and I can't write couplets at a considerable level. It is difficult to stand out and get ahead. Partial and unwilling to be lonely, always peeping at opportunities, trying to show off and grandstanding. ? Informal and level? At the beginning of the discussion, I couldn't wait to get a chance to rise to the top. Knowing that this kind of discussion is difficult to realize, we should also support the protagonist, do everything possible to search for the present and the present, ask for quotations from others, or even make it out of nothing, and try our best to dress up as an eccentric? Reformer? The way it looks.
These strange symptoms of couplets directly expose the serious physical defects of couplets. Compared with China's poems, China's couplets have three obvious hidden dangers. First, congenital deficiency. Most friends in the poetry circle can write couplets, and they write well, and many of them are experts. So most poets are couplets. Of course, this is not surprising. Poetry is comprehensive. However, quite a few people in our couplets can't write well or even understand poetry. Isn't this a strange thing? If there is no poetic accomplishment, how good can it be to write couplets?
Second, acquired disorder. In most competitions in the field of poetry, the winning works are basically guaranteed to be excellent works, and the finalists can also be guaranteed to be legal and qualified works. But what about couplets? Although many excellent works have emerged, sometimes even the qualified products cannot be guaranteed in the award-winning works. Even in some competitions, there are piles of fake and inferior products among the winners and finalists. Visible? Judges? The level of students is low.
The third is chaos. Academic research is also carried out in the field of poetry. Discuss what? This paper discusses how China's poetry entered the campuses of universities and primary and secondary schools, how his poetry creation eulogized the reform and opening up, carried forward the main theme of the times, and how to adapt to the development of pronunciation, writing and rhyme of Putonghua, but no one has ever put forward the argument of breaking the rhythm of poetry. But what about couplets? Fight? What is this? The focus of the debate is to deny the so-called definition of couplets themselves. Informal and level? Absurd question. To deny leveling is to fundamentally subvert the basic elements of couplets, that is, to tear down one's own platform and ruin one's job. Isn't it crazy to confuse couplets?
Congenital deficiency, acquired disorder and self-disorder, the prospect of couplets is really worrying. It's time for China's couplets to clear their heads and seriously reflect.
May China's couplets go well and truly realize the third prosperity of the art of couplets.
? Informal and level? Theoretically, it should be over.
(anti-people's valley note: I shared many opinions in this article, but I feel very sorry for the writing style of the article. I have talked with many friends who share the same view. They think the point of view of this article is very good, but the brushwork will attract many people's disgust. The villain's view of the leveling theory is: 1, you can't prove your point with examples, otherwise you can cite a bunch of examples, and I can also find a bunch of evidence to attack each other, and the result is unconvincing. The discussion of leveling theory should be based on the characteristics, functions and restrictive factors of leveling. 2. to discuss? Pingyi? Development and perfection of instruments. Leveling theory has existed for thousands of years. Because of the objective reality of language development, it does have many conflicts with real life. It can be said that the most important thing at present is not? Negative? With what? Protection? The problem of leveling theory is to discuss the function, limitation, development and perfection of leveling theory. If you stick to the rigid theory of standards, I'm afraid no one can say for sure. Pingyi? Theory can't be broken. 3. When discussing the leveling theory, everyone should stand on an equal footing. Unlike the author of this paper, don't stand on the side of experts and experts, and put everyone else on the opposite side. The result of the discussion is very difficult, and it is easy for people to grasp the topic and really participate in the discussion of leveling. It can't be said that everyone is proficient, at least a little, not at all. As the saying goes? The reason is not high? , Mr. Lu Xun said? Is intimidation and abuse not a fight? To discuss the right or wrong of a theory lies not in the use of affirmative tone or interrogative tone, but in the scientificity and accuracy of the theory. Therefore, when discussing problems, we should calmly and calmly present the facts, be reasonable, and don't be aggressive and give orders to others. This is a warning to writers, but also to others. )
- Related articles
- What is the zodiac sign of Happy Landlord Fight?
- What is the Tanabata Festival also known as the festival
- What are the ancient Chinese dances
- How to memorize a large number of Chinese characters by writing system memory method
- How to play Guild Wars 2
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Genetically Modified Foods (Answers in Chinese and English)
- Clothing English translation
- What are the advantages of consumer finance compared with traditional finance?
- How to make watercolor painting simple
- Who is the subject of a 2 and a half storey rural brother's duplex self-build house under 150,000?