Which system is smoother for vivo, OPPO and glory?

Above. is my opinion on this issue, just for reference.

The smoothness of the system is related to two dimensions: hardware configuration + system optimization.

First, let's talk about the hardware configuration, OPPO, vivo mainly use Qualcomm processors, the glory of the Huawei self-developed Kirin chip. Qualcomm's Snapdragon series after 660, the performance is basically more stable. Kirin series from 920, the performance is widely recognized by the industry.

In addition, only a few years of fierce competition in the domestic cell phone, manufacturers in order to please the user, the flagship processor tilted to the low-end and mid-range smartphones, so no matter what price point of the smartphone you use in the hands of OPPO, vivo or glory, as long as it is not particularly savage, basically have a smoother use experience.

The other big thing is system optimization, and all three brands have operating systems based on Android, with Vivo's FuntouchOS, OPPO's colorOS, and Glory's EMUI (renamed MagicUI for some models). So what are the features of each of these three in terms of system optimization?

FuntouchOS focuses on the Jovi Smart Scene, which has targeted optimizations for network services, game acceleration, and smart voice, which are more frequently used in daily life. This solution of centralized resource invocation by the system greatly improves the smoothness of the system.

Since OPPO poached Flyme's engineers, colorOS has been transformed. The latest colorOS 7.1, for example, intelligently allocates system space through self-developed memory anti-fragmentation optimization technology, improving smoothness of use by about 18%.

EMUI was once criticized for having an ugly interface, but the new EMUI 10 has optimized this aspect a lot, and the UI design is very stylish. In addition, the smoothness of the transition animation has been improved a lot, and with the optimization of the Ark compiler, the system smoothness is not a problem at all.

Overall, OPPO, Vivo and Glory, as the head brand of China, there is not much difference in the smoothness of use, so you can just pick according to your own preferences.

VIVO's system is called FuntouchOS, OPPO's system is called ColorOS, and Honor's system is also Huawei's EMUI system. These three systems are a little more smooth, EMUI said the second, the domestic really do not have any dare to say is the first, Huawei's EMUI system has an excellent experience as well as smoothness. Especially smooth is the result of Android deep optimization.

VIVO system and OPPO system, although both called OS, are based on the Android system UI development and customization, the two systems focus on the stability of the main system update is not too active, but for the transition of the dynamic and aesthetic design VIVO and OPPO system to do quite good, aesthetic design at the forefront, the EMUI is not a rival. In the domestic as well as the global cell phone market, only Huawei has the ability to do this, that is, the optimization of the Android kernel, so EMUI is the optimization of the DNA level, is the optimization of the overall system, so Huawei's cell phone update speed is also quite fast, it is not a simple UI customization, and the OV cell phone, as well as millet and phantom of these cell phone dealers, are the UI customization, so relative to the system's adaptability will be a little slower. Of course, it also has a lot to do with the technical power.

On the other hand, the personalization aspect of the OV system are doing very well, and EMUI's personalization is not enough, stability and smoothness is its characteristics, and is the lasting smoothness and stability.

OPPO's system is ColorOS, based on the depth of Android customization system;

VIVO's system is FuntouchOS, based on the depth of the development of the Android system;

Gloria's system is the Emotion UI system, referred to as EMUI, also based on the development of Android Emotion user interface.

This is the same point of the three ****, are based on Android custom system, but in the specific system optimization and interface settings, and has a completely different performance.

The systems of the three brands are all based on Android for development, and in terms of system smoothness performance, I think Huawei's EMUI is superior to the first two, especially the upcoming EMUI 10 version. In terms of improvements to performance, the new EMUI promises 30 months of performance degradation of less than 10%, a GPUTurbo performance improvement of up to 60%, while LinkTurbo improves the average speed of the network by more than 70% over a single 4G speed, in addition to the EROFS filesystem random read performance has been improved by 20%, and after recompiling with its own Ark compiler, the smoothness of the App application is more than 60%. It is understood that this update will be in the second half of the year to open internal testing of some models, including the P30 series, mate20 series and this among the lowest price, cost-effective honor 20 series and so on.

The OS system of OPPO and VIVO, the main focus is the stability of the system, relatively closed, high security. In terms of stability is more able to fight, and even use the user himself will feel that he is limited, but on the smoothness of the system should be slightly inferior.

The three brands currently have their own representative models, vivo's IQOO series, the main focus is also cost-effective; OPPO's reno series, reno2 is also coming, the price range corresponds to Huawei's glory 20 Pro, in the three cell phones to choose the words, I still recommend the glory of the 20 Pro.

< /p>

First of all, based on Huawei's EMUI system, which is now quite mature, in the usual office learning, file transfer is very convenient, and secondly, the glory 20 Pro equipped with the Hesse Kirin 980 chip, in the score situation and P30, mate20Pro close to the photographic function of the "able to fight" as one of the selling points, which is indeed the case. As one of the selling points, it is true that the rear quad-camera 8 million telephoto lens, equipped with optical stabilization technology, laser positioning technology. Battery capacity of 4000mAh, 22.5W fast charging. Compared to the standard version of the 20, the 20 PRO is a step up in performance in terms of photography, and the optical stabilization technology is a very big gain in handheld shooting. The large battery life is much better. It is also lighter and better looking than the IQOO.

Thanks for reading.

That's actually a pretty generalized question.

Then let's do a best of each cell phone manufacturer or give an example of a flagship model to do a comparison.

First from vivo start, vivo cell phone cost-effective models, iQOO series, iQOOpro just listed, take it to say vivo smooth situation. vivopro, support for 5G, equipped with Qualcomm Snapdragon 855plus processor, multi-core performance has even surpassed Apple's A12, running score of nearly half a million. Not only is the score amazing, the game optimization and so on. Although I have not personally hands on, but at the launch I have felt its supercar body (Fast and Furious special action cooperation model) to bring the enjoyment of silky smooth, which is not only refers to the appearance and its {real fragrance} processor ah.

oppo's flagship model rneo 10x zoom version, reno2 is coming soon and iQOOpro should be about the same, but not before we talk about reno1. The phone is equipped with Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor, hands-on, feel quite good, whether it is the speed or feel have quite good experience. This model, too, has game optimization and liquid cooling. The score situation is nearly 370,000, which is also a very good result.

Glory came, glory 20pro, on the Hesse Kirin 980 processor talk. First look at the running score, nearly 310000 running score. And mate20pro, p30 score close to the normal range of Kirin 980.

Let's not talk about the GPU for now, Qualcomm's GPU is also at an advantage. From the processor alone, vivo's "silky smooth" degree is higher than oppo, and glory's "silky smooth" degree is lower than oppo.

The above is my summary. Different opinions and views of the students, comment area message Oh ~

The phone's smoothness on the one hand depends on the hardware, mainly the processor and memory. On the other hand, it depends on the system optimization, in fact, not only the system, but also include some peripheral acceleration technology, compilation technology and so on. To say that the three cell phone system who is better to use can also comment on, but to which system is more fluent is not really good to divide, there is no professional test in this area, reference data is also limited, the following I would like to say some of my views.

I looked through several issues of LU Masters UI smooth list, which does not honor the magic UI, Huawei's EMUI is often on the list, so with reference to this authoritative ranking, the glory of the system is the worst, but taking into account that the magic rely on Huawei's EMUI, only a short time before the independence of the smoothness of the degree of not too bad.

For now, VIVO, oppo, glory three systems are based on Android 9.0, the bottom of the system is the same, all changes are not the same, essentially the same thing, as long as it is not technology is too crummy, in the UI of the smooth experience are not too bad.

The overall design style of VIVO's funtouchOS is very minimalist, focusing on small freshness and intelligence, providing some technological fun, simple and at the same time without losing generosity and playability, the whole is similar to Xiaomi's MIUI, but it is simpler than MIUI, and the fun of intelligence is not bad at all. Coupled with the newly added MUlti-turbo technology and gaming mode and so on, there is a very high experience in smoothness, in addition, Vivo's system has always been and Tencent's have cooperation, in playing the game with priority, better experience, in the usual is not to see.

In addition, Vivo's JOVI artificial intelligence is the best voice assistant in these systems, the glory of the YOYO is not a level at present, in addition to millet's small love classmates in domestic cell phones, the best voice assistant is probably JOVI. In the stability and smoothness of vivo has been at the top of the list, look at those hundred dollars why the machine is so durable, the system optimization can not be ignored.

oppo system is similar to vivo at the beginning, but with the development of a plus, oppo has a kind of start to lean towards the direction of simplicity, its degree of simplicity is the highest in these phones, more and more have a plus H2OS feeling, in addition to some necessary functions, the rest are streamlining. However, oppo has been doing better in the details, UI design is also very small and fresh, the painting style with vivo a little deviation, but the interaction is more simple, but the fun is going to be a little worse, in terms of smoothness is relatively better.

Honor magic UI is a relatively young UI, according to the glory of the statement, the main future of technology, but this is the dress EMUI, the biggest change is the artificial intelligence life form YOYO, but this voice assistant has not yet grown up, the manipulation is really limited.

Back to the system itself, thanks to the GPU-Turbo and Huawei Ark compiler, the glory system is good in terms of smoothness, but still not out of the EMUI, EMUI focus on business, the overall bias is calm, the function is very comprehensive, so the use of it is not as simple as the OV is simple and clear, it depends on the individual more like which one. In accordance with the nature of the operating system, the more features means that the system occupies more resources, that the smoothness of the relative reduction, which is why a plus system so smooth but some people criticized, said that the system castration is too strong, good multi-functional are not, you need to use with the help of third-party software to use. So as far as smoothness is concerned, the glory is a little worse, at least from my subjective feeling of using these phones, OV is a little more rapid, but it's not just the UI, but also the processor.

Overall, a phone smooth or not, but also depends on the combination of hardware and software, look at the system alone is more to look at the design and functionality, but to want to function more also want to system smooth that is impossible, IOS so cattle, every upgrade to join the new features will have a certain degree of decline, the more the function of the redundancy, which is the same as a person to carry a hundred pounds can not be faster than carrying fifty pounds.

OPPO's system is ColorOS, based on the depth of Android customization system;

VIVO's system is OriginOS is to retain the stability of the basis of the further enhancement of the UI design, visual animation, as well as more in line with the visual transition animation

Glorious of the system is the system of Emotion UI system, referred to as EMUI, the same

The Emotion UI is based on the Android development

All three have their own characteristics

This is not necessary to say. The Honor system is definitely smoother. Because the Honor phone has Huawei's blood. I've always used Honor phones. My wife uses a Huawei phone. Before I have a friend with the OPOP phone card to death. The only good thing about the system optimization is that the face value is better looking.

I'm proud to use Glory. After all, it's a national brand we have to support. As long as we like our own phone. The system will do even better. Only then will go on the century. Toward the global [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart] [than heart].

Wen/Xiaoyi Review Technology

The systems of VIVO, OPPO, and Glory phones are Funtouch OS, Color OS, and Magic UI (that is, a variant of EMUI, the bottom is exactly the same), respectively.

From my personal experience, as the domestic head of several cell phone companies to build the operating system, these operating systems are not essentially different, after all, everyone's underlying architecture is Android, then it is destined to Android's advantages we all have, and Android's shortcomings also exist, it is difficult to say who is good and who is bad, basically, the difference in style.

A few years ago, if anyone can do a good job with non-linear animation on Android, it's really very, very impressive. But as Android and the performance of its hardware have evolved in recent years, all the UIs (or OSes) of all the phone brands today have very well-tuned non-linear animations.

And this animation effect should be the most can reflect the system smoothness of one of the iconic factors, then I will also give you a list of these three domestic system of non-linear animation effect (video file traffic party caution)

First: VIVO Funtouch OS

First: VIVO Funtouch OS

Second: OPPO Color OS

Third: Huawei EMUI

From the non-linear animation effect of the three systems, I personally believe that VIVO's Funtouch OS has the highest level of dynamic articulation and visual comfort, and does not over-pursuit the speed.

From the perspective of the three systems, I think VIVO's Funtouch OS has the highest dynamic articulation and visual comfort, without excessive pursuit of speed, its comprehensive performance and Apple's IOS is relatively similar; Color OS is the pursuit of a sense of speed, animation over the effect of the speed of the faster; as for the EMUI appears to be the most ordinary and mediocre, not the other two systems appear to be exquisite, which is the EMUI system has always been a traditional flaw.

In addition, I also put a special IOS system dynamic effects, you can see, I think the Android mainstream system and IOS system is still the biggest gap in the background bokeh and the response speed of the touch, which is really has been the traditional strength of the IOS.

The strongest IOS system dynamic effect display

To sum up, VIVO's Funtouch, OPPO's Color OS, and Huawei's EMUI, there is no big difference between good and bad from the system's smoothness, and all of them have been very smooth and very easy to follow, with high refresh rate screens. With the high refresh rate of the screen, the system is not inferior to Apple's, so you can rest assured that you will be able to choose.

According to the station's news, VIVO has tapped Apple's IOS team to lead the research and development of its own new system, which is called Origin OS and will be officially released on November 19th.

One of the most exciting news about the domestic Rom industry is that VIVO has tapped Apple's IOS design team to lead the development of VIVO's new system.

From the current network exposure of the UI interface diagram, the new version of the system in the ICON design is obviously very different from the design of other domestic manufacturers, the style is more anthropomorphic, the level is also very clear, it is worth looking forward to a wave.