What are the differences and connections between China's traditional people-oriented thought and modern people-oriented thought?

I wrote it myself and borrowed some information. I hope it will help you.

The traditional people-oriented policy is basically a policy adopted by the landlord class rulers to safeguard their own notices. Its people-oriented purpose is to make people accept its notice and safeguard world peace, which can be seen from the theory that "water can carry a boat and also overturn it".

Contemporary people-oriented is a scientific theory put forward by Zhong, and people-oriented is the core of Scientific Outlook on Development. It is the embodiment of the party's fundamental purpose of serving the people wholeheartedly. Adhering to the people-oriented principle is in the same strain as China's serving the people wholeheartedly and representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people in China.

At present, as a philosophical value, people-oriented and people-oriented are different. People-oriented is about the relationship between people and things, people and God, and people-oriented is about the relationship between people. People and officials are relative.

So there is an essential difference between the two.

Talk about the connection between the two.

In the history of China, "people" and "people" are sometimes universal, and people-oriented means people-oriented. In the Tang Dynasty, in order to avoid Li Shimin's taboo, "person" was changed to "person". Both emphasize the importance of people. They are all reflections of China's traditional philosophy. "The people are the most important, the country is the second, and the monarch is the light." Mencius' viewpoint shines with the light of human nature.