Does wearing Chinese dress really mean promoting traditional Chinese culture?

In many ancient TV dramas, you can often see that the ancient people are wearing more gorgeous, and all with extremely wide sleeves, but why would the ancient people like big sleeves? And this common phenomenon is real, or TV works fabricated? Would anyone in ancient society really wear clothes with big sleeves?

In fact, in recent years, Hanbok are also very common, and those who know Hanbok should know that the cuffs of Hanbok are very wide and look very beautiful. However, in ancient times can afford to wear a large sleeve Hanbok is relatively few people, and the modern so-called Hanbok, but also just capitalists used to conduct business transactions of a gimmick bar just, so we also need to distinguish between.

While many of our friends have promoted the promotion of traditional Chinese culture, but a false appearance, with the breath of capitalism Hanbok, may not be able to represent China's traditional culture, let alone rely on Hanbok to promote Chinese culture, in ancient China, many common people can not afford to wear such gorgeous clothes, the ancient common people, most of them are short hit, that is, we are commonly called the Short sleeves and shorts, or narrow-sleeved clothes, wide sleeve robe simply can not afford to wear.

Of course, here also does not mean that Hanfu can not represent the traditional Chinese culture, but if you listen to the capitalists, because wear a Hanfu, will be able to carry forward the Chinese culture to the fullest, and even this represents the traditional Chinese dress, may be a little too much, after all, the existing Hanfu on the market, and the traditional Hanfu compared to the Hanfu, there is a big gap, and the Hanfu's exquisite degree is equivalent to the aristocratic class. And when was the feudal aristocracy able to become the essence of Chinese culture? To put it bluntly, it's still capitalists trying to make money, just under the guise of promoting traditional Chinese culture.

Ancient cloth was very expensive, and even some expensive fabrics, can be used as money, but obviously, such expensive cloth, no matter in what era, the common class can not afford to wear, but if the upper class standards (luxury goods), to measure the whole of the ancient Chinese society, and even to the upper class standards, to interpret is the essence of the culture of the ancient Chinese, then it may be It may be out of standard. And where does that leave the common people?

The excellent traditional Chinese language does need to be promoted, but is it really worthwhile to promote a Chinese culture that has no substance? Obviously, modern young people may also need to know how to recognize what is the real essence of Chinese culture, rather than losing the pursuit of the essence of Chinese culture in the advertisements of capitalists, and the blackmail of the masses. Blind reverence is a kind of disrespect for traditional culture.

Patriotic and carry forward the excellent Chinese cultural traditions, is indeed every Chinese should be to do, but also hope that every one so to do, should be to really understand, or just greedy appearance, will always be a kind of blasphemy to the culture, Hanfu may be so, and those on the market in vain Hanfu, really can be an excellent culture? Or not, do you think?