What is people-oriented and what does it mean?

The basic meaning of people-oriented concept

There are many references to the word "min" in ancient literature, and the understanding is different, but its original meaning is clear, that is, it refers to the ignorant in the primitive natural state, such as "naturally steaming the people" and "virgin". Both mean ignorance. However, whether the ignorant concept of "man" means that the ancients understood it with contempt remains to be discussed. Second, the ideal of a well-off society based on people. Third, the way of community autonomy under naturalistic norms. Fourth, in what sense is the people-oriented concept ignorant? Fifth, it is concluded that people-oriented and democracy are different concepts, which has been recognized by academic circles. As far as the practical significance of studying people-oriented concept is concerned, people are first out of a sense of belonging, which is similar to religious belief for us. Based on this belief, people-oriented thought should be designed as a model of community democracy, not as an ideological resource. Secondly, when we study people-oriented thought, we should study it with a scientific attitude of seeking truth from facts. Recently, positive results have been achieved. If someone compares the differences between Korean, Japanese, China and other Confucian civilization circles, it is found that the traditional lifestyles and economic distribution forms of the three countries are different, which leads to different development speed and civilization degree in the process of transforming into modern society. Finally, it should be emphasized that the study of people-oriented thought is not only a topic in the history of thought, but also involves a wider range of fields. In the way of thinking, we should pay attention to several basic differences: first, social ideal and political system. People-oriented is just a social ideal, and democracy is a political system based on individual political power, but this democratic system must not go against people-oriented social ideal. Second, democracy and freedom are problems. Democracy is developed on the basis of the separation of church and state under the tradition of metaphysical thinking (rationality) and religious concepts. For westerners, people's thoughts, feelings and bodies can be separated from each other, but for us, thoughts, feelings and bodies are inseparable. As Laozi said, "I have a big patient, but I have a body." This means that thought is action, and thought is controlled by power while controlling social behavior. Freedom of thought is the goal of mankind, and democracy is only the means to achieve it. From this perspective, freedom of thought is the foundation of the development of modern society, and people-oriented thought can be truly implemented. Thirdly, on the issue of effectiveness and objectivity, modern philosophy rejects the overall objectivity, which has also caused some negative effects in the process of western modernization, such as human alienation, social justice and two world wars. , are related to such ideological roots. In fact, when we emphasize the objectivity of our social reality, we have already put our subjective prejudice in. If we still study people-oriented thinking with this attitude, it will be difficult to get out of the traditional way of thinking. Therefore, ideological enlightenment and the change of thinking mode should be the inevitable destination of modernity.