What are the similarities and differences between the modernization of Britain, France and the United States?

The federal presidential system and political system are typical modern separation of powers. Government administration, parliamentary legislation and court justice, the three powers contain and supervise each other. The government is led by the president, and there is a vice president, but it is only a virtual post, which is equivalent to the assistant of the president. If the president dies during his term of office, the vice president will take over. In particular, if both presidents die at the same time, the Speaker of the House of Representatives will take over the presidency and the Congress will be split in two. Mainly to do some macro national policy decisions, budgets and legislation, and sometimes there are some endless topics. The next court, the American court, can be truly independent of the government, which is really worth learning from many countries in the world today, mainly thanks to its judge formation system and jury system. I won't say much here, because there are many forms.

The economic characteristics of the United States are directly related to its national spirit of advocating freedom. They believe that as long as there is freedom, everyone's creativity can be fully exerted. Therefore, they greatly advocate capital freedom, that is, the capitalist system. They believe that free capital will spontaneously find out the most valuable projects. Therefore, if politicians talk to Americans about the gap between the rich and the poor, they will get no response at all. Their national characteristics have decided this.

Culturally, diversity is followed by self-confidence and independence. They think that they have absorbed the essence of people of all nationalities in the world, so they are the future of the world, so they are particularly confident. They always feel like saviors, just like heroes in martial arts. The higher their martial arts, the greater their responsibilities. Personally, I think this understanding has a lovely side, which can complement the culture of China now.

Britain, England

Constitutional monarchy, the king is the nominal head of state, but the actual government power lies in the cabinet, and its form is basically the same as that of Japan, not just Japan. Many former imperialist countries adopted this political model through relatively peaceful revolutionary forms. Usually we think that the Prime Minister is the highest head of state, and Britain is the origin of modern politics. I quite agree with its original definition of power. Everyone gives a small part of his power to some people, so that his other powers can be guaranteed. Personally, I think it is this definition that makes modern politics move in the direction of civilization. That's all.

Britain is an old economic power, but it has been surpassed by other countries in many aspects. It is difficult to point out which line is unique to Britain and the best in the world, but its deep industrial background is enough to make it occupy a place in today's world. It is worth mentioning that his financial industry should be the second largest financial center after new york at present, but it is estimated that it will not last long.

The most commendable thing about British culture is that it has a thousand-year-old traditional aristocratic culture, which can be seen not only by nobles, but also by ordinary people. This cultural trait is very interesting. Interested parties can discuss it in depth. It stands to reason that the British democratic culture has also developed to a very mature stage, and there is no hierarchical differentiation between people. But it seems that the whole nation has a sense of self-nobility, so its citizens give people a very elegant feeling.

France

From a historical point of view, French politics is definitely better than ten Hollywood blockbusters. The French have always been uneasy about the status quo, but occasionally they like nostalgia. China people's political views can be said to be very chaotic and diversified. Now France has a presidential system, but now French politics is really ordinary and there is nothing to say. If you are interested, go and read French history books, starting with Louis XIV, the king of the sun. It is absolutely wonderful.

France's economy, like Britain's, basically has no bright spots and is ordinary, but it is still a developed country with sufficient capital support, but if you expect him to come up with any new tricks, forget it!

French culture can be said to be a country's megalomaniac, but sometimes it has to face the grim reality. It is undeniable that historically, they have much to be proud of, especially their cultural heritage. For political reasons, France has experienced many things. In just two hundred years, the people won the fifth * * * and the country. Every social change will deposit a thick layer on their ideological understanding. The world says that the French are romantic, but the reason is that they are confident to the point of narcissism.