What kind of routines can arouse the audience's thinking in the debate?

If we want to mobilize the audience, we should start with the characteristics of the audience. Different audiences have different levels of knowledge, education and academic emphasis, and the specific situation should be analyzed in detail.

Generally speaking, for the audience, the core is "simple explanation". That is, they are easy to understand without much thinking and understanding, but at the same time they can understand the core content of your argument.

For example, suppose today's debate is about whether supporting domestic production is conducive to national economic development. If you say that the decrease in import and foreign trade income may lead to the withdrawal of foreign capital and thus affect regional economic development, then the audience may be a question mark. But put it another way. Everyone doesn't buy Samsung's mobile phone today. When Samsung finds that it can't make much money in China, it will close the factory, causing many people to lose their jobs (just for example, there are many problems with this statement). That's easier for the audience to understand.

However, if this is a debate contest in the School of Economics, there is obviously no pressure to use academic language, so we can choose different ways according to different types of audiences.

To sum up, mobilize the audience's emotions, such as > theory, life > academic. In addition, for the audience, tone, intonation, speed of speech and the use of body language are all very important, which is more about the skills of speech.