Why is Hamlet's revenge tragedy a tragedy of his own character, a tragedy of humanists and a tragedy of the times?

Contradiction between new ideas and old systems: Hamlet is a new humanistic youth who has been baptized by new ideas, but at the same time he is a member of the royal family rooted in the ruling class of feudal society, and he can't get rid of the shackles of feudal system on his own reality. The new ideology is weak: Hamlet himself is only a member of the royal family. Before the system is fundamentally changed, a rational leader with anti-feudal nature is bound to be weak in this feudal system and will be rejected by members of the feudal system he opposes. Therefore, with rational thinking and support, he can only complete his revenge plan and gradually complete his ideal. Doubt determined by reason: Hamlet is a rational thinker. Reason determines the seriousness of his attitude towards knowing things. Before the truth comes out, he often doubts the situation he faces, which once hindered his revenge. Deep reason: 1. Hamlet was in the Renaissance when the traditional value system was shaken. The conflict between belief and reason in the ideological field led to fierce inner conflict, which made him at a loss between belief and reason. The cruel reality forced Hamlet to take on the heavy responsibility of revenge and revival of Gankun. Revenge conflicts with Christian theology, and the rational spirit is not enough to support his resurrection of Gan Kun, which eventually leads to Hamlet's serious spiritual crisis. Hamlet is introverted and a natural thinker. He devoted his life to building his spiritual home and pinned his hopes on his dreams, but the cruel changes in the world forced him to face the reality. He had a hard struggle between reality and dreams. But even if you choose which one, the extreme reality will lead him to ruin. The delay of revenge is actually a long and difficult process for him to think rationally about his fate from his spiritual home, so he will ask "life or death" in the process of delaying revenge. Finally, when the world he once knew became strange because of hypocrisy, he chose to die with these hypocrisy and give his unfinished business to his friends. 3, "To be or not to be" is a proposition that has been considered in the history of human social philosophy, and it has never really been solved. Even though we can say that we can be content with our fate and enjoy ourselves immediately, no one can get a real answer to this proposition. People's smallness is not only manifested in the shortness of life, but also in the limitations of our bodies. It's that our mind and soul can't reach a permanent and stable height. Facing the vast universe, we sigh not only the brevity of life, but also the internal connection between this limited life and infinite time and space. When we are exploring this problem, unpredictable bumps always hinder our progress. The gap between lofty ideals and cruel reality has to make us have more doubts about the nature of our lives. Doubt what is the meaning of our existence, doubt our soul, doubt the relationship between the world and ourselves, we should actively transform the world we know, so as to face many dangers; Or stop on the road of endless truth and let yourself be ignorant forever to save your life.