China, Britain, France, Germany, Japan, Ukraine six countries military strength comparison?

Comprehensive strength or China's first, after all, independent research and development of the hydrogen bomb in the world is only China and the United States can do, the Soviet Union is to steal the U.S. drawings; five-generation machine is also closely follow the trend of the United States, in short, although in most military industry and can not be said to be the first, but the comprehensive point of view has surpassed Russia, of course, and the United States gap is still not small ... ...

Then there is Britain and France, the British technology point is more remote, but the strength of the strength in aviation can not be underestimated. France has hydrogen bomb and nuke miniaturization technology traded from China, and Dassault is not weak. But Old Europe is on the wrong path above the development of the fifth generation aircraft, in addition to the lack of land weapons, and naval decline

After that are Germany and Italy, Germany's tank artillery technology is superb, and Italy is unique in naval artillery.

Sweden and Israel are small countries that lack the capacity for sustained warfare and comprehensive research and development, but they are able to develop weapons suited to their own operational environments, which can be considered outstanding

South Africa and Japan have basically no technology of their own, but they can rely on purchased technology to cobble together their own weaponry, and of course, have almost no research and development capabilities (like Japan's Vajra Class, F2 "Goldilocks Catwoman Branchwoman Exporter", the former breadbasket of Europe can't even feed itself anymore

Brazil's military power is okay on paper, but unfortunately it's just too close to the US ......

Spain? Military industry? Oh ......