For traditional culture, innovation is more important than inheritance This is a debate we are trying to show that for traditional culture, inheritance is more important than innovation.

What can be innovative is not traditional. To innovate traditional culture is in itself a false proposition.

The most important thing is that the traditional culture itself has thousands of years of inheritance, already has a mature systematic theory, if it can be changed, thousands of years would have changed! It is not possible that those of us who can think of the theory, the old ancestors thousands of years could not think of, may not have been so arrogant people dare to say so that they are the first in thousands of years.

To say innovation, only in modern technology, network, mechanics to innovation. But modern technology itself is not traditional culture! Traditional culture is human morality, philosophical thinking, for this aspect, who dares to say change it? Who dares to innovate a new set of ethics?