What are the problems in China's financial supervision referred to by Ma Yun?

The problem is all in this sentence: after supervision by many regulatory authorities around the world, it has become that there is no risk in its own department, but the whole economy is risky and the whole economy has not developed. The competition in the future is the competition of innovation, not just the competition of supervision skills. ? In fact, Ma Yun originally planned to retire as a teacher, but his reputation was particularly loud and big. There is no way. The greater man's ability, the greater the responsibility of nature. Just as some ordinary people see the disadvantages, he has no ability to turn the tide, and if capable people don't tell Malik's cloud, then there is a bottleneck and upper limit on how the economy develops.

Moreover, the risk of the financial sector has always been high-risk. What Ma Yun said is that the systemic risk of finance is not the most important, and a healthy financial system should be taken seriously. When he said this sentence, he pointed out that this kind of risk is not only unique to China, but also the most existing drawback in the financial market all over the world. Although I don't know whether what he said is true or not, judging from his past records, it should still have some credibility.

It's just that Ma Yun's attacks this time are all bosses in the financial sector, so some people have already smashed the pot in this position and their position in society is pervasive. Therefore, if a person shows his face like this, even if he knows in his heart that Ma Yun is right, his face is unwilling to admit it.

If so, I think the development of an economy is the most important, because face is more important. In the end, he can't repay your economic debt and improve your economic strength.

But what Ma Yun said is mainly that he has a long-term vision, and we don't know if we can go this way. It takes time to verify. If we make a mistake, what should we say? Who should bear such responsibility?