What are the types of socially accepted legal rights, according to Marx and Weber?

There are three types. Simply put, they are traditional, charismatic, and legally justified.

The first type, based on long-established customs and traditions, is traditional au-thority. In fact, the core of this type lies in the influence of customs and traditions, which are understood to encompass everything that has been passed on from the past to the present, i.e., long-standing customs, practices, institutions, social or political systems, values, beliefs, etc. These have been accepted by previous generations and have been accepted by the present. These "always existed" rules, accepted by previous generations and sanctified by history, are generally accepted by the public as fixed and unquestionable rules, reflecting both the continuity of social transmission and the fact that traditional authority is the way society has always been and does not need to be proved. The most obvious examples are the patriarchal and patriarchal systems that have long existed in Chinese society and the elder politics that still exist in some rural areas. Another characteristic of traditional authority is its close association with hereditary systems of power and privilege, as evidenced, for example, by the continued existence of dynastic rule in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Morocco in the Middle East. The influence of traditional authority in modern developed industrialized societies has been negligible, but in the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands and other constitutional monarchies, there is still respect for the royal family, obedience to tradition, fulfillment of obligations and other values continue to be inherited, so it can be seen that the traditional authority is still constantly affecting the development of political culture.

The second type is the charismatic authority, which is the charisma type. The basis of this kind of authority is the individual's personality power, that is, the person's extraordinary charisma. Charisma was first a theological term that specialized in God-given things and was the source of the power of discipleship in Catholic doctrine. Weber used this theological concept to explain social phenomena, referring to personal power or charisma that establishes leadership through the psychological control of others; thus, charismatic authority has an almost mystical quality, encompassing a spirit that inspires loyalty, emotional dependence, and even devotion. Weber points out that this type of authority has nothing to do with personal status, social position, or office, but is purely about the leader's ability to exert influence as some kind of hero or saint who has the ability to speak directly and personally to his followers. There is no shortage of such figures in contemporary politics, such as Hitler, Mussolini, and Gaddafi, all of whom, without exception, have used their own personality traits and charisma to inspire loyalty and thus extend their authority and stabilize their regimes. The legitimacy of such rule is based solely on the public's backing behind the cult of personality of the leader.

The third type is the legal-rational authority. The third type of authority is legal-rational authority (legal-rational authority), which links authority to a well-defined set of legal rules, and power is ultimately determined by formal constitutional rules that constrain or limit public **** power and the power of public officials to behave in a way that is typical of the authority of most modern countries. The advantage of this type of legitimacy over the previous two is that authority is attached to the office rather than to the individual, and it is less likely to be abused or to cause injustice. As a result, he is able to maintain a limited government and increase efficiency through the division of labor. This type is central to Weber's theory of bureaucratic organization. It is also the system of authority that Weber considered to be dominant in modern society. Weber also used "bureaucracy" to call this type.