Where can I download UFC fight videos, Black Boxing, and the legendary Frank Chan "Tang Long" fight videos?

They are not viable? What kind of fight do you understand? Is fighting a complicated thing? You'll say yes, that's fine.

We should harmonize the definition of what most people understand by 'live fighting' before we continue our analysis.

I'm guessing that what most people understand by a real fight is when you get into trouble on the street and need to step up to the plate to fight, which is commonly known as a fight. That means the chances of you ever meeting an expert in your life are very small, and the vast majority of times you meet an average person (and an average person at the same level). Encounter and you the same level you two tear put a moment, encounter heavyweight estimate also can not fight, because the weak party will not choose to fight in the beginning, do not dare. Then the actual combat can be defined as with the same level of ordinary people competition (but also is not practiced, I said, meet the practitioner is rare. But don't rule it out, it's just a matter of fighting and losing). It's very close to the early UFC, unranked. And there is no blood feud between the two, who would use the so-called "must kill"? You're not going to kill each other, are you? You're outside the law, right? The first thing you need to do is to get out of the way and get out of the way.

If you say that this is not the understanding of the actual combat, you understand the actual combat should be a variety of skills, strength, wisdom, the perfect combination of the comprehensive embodiment, please show me, you said that the kind of competition where? As men who like to fight fight fight want to see it so that we can all follow and learn.

Well, foreign wrestling fighting friends look down on messy fighting, then he just want to see there are technical strong tournaments, a lot of ah, go see it. But the mixed martial arts genre is only this one ah. But you shouldn't be looking over there and belittling it, it's going to make people think of immorality and questionable character. You don't care about that, do you?

The instructional movie jumped three times and it was a mistake? Why do you only see him jumping and not think that people just don't think to delete it? How true. Your friend offended your family for you, would you go up to your friend with a head and a face? You should not also analyze your friend's original intention is for you ah, some of the problems we do not use a more intelligent way of thinking, that would have to hurt and misunderstand how many people or things that are well-intentioned! Please let us look at something more y!

A messy fight? Which of the street fights we can see is not a messy fight? Because it's something I haven't done any research on, just speaking from my feelings as a layman too (the probability of something is what makes it relatively objective).

Kimbo is considered a street fighter in the US, right? Would you look down on him because he's a big gangster without gloves? But the fact is, doesn't a bully like that get knocked out by so-called third-rate fighters! That doesn't mean anything. If, according to most people's understanding, the ultimate form of fighting is fighting, and the ultimate place of expression is the street, then Kimbo is the originator of American combat fighting, right? But didn't he also lose? Who has shown evidence that other fighters are undefeated in street fights? Don't say they don't give a shit, that's because you can't call a person a street fighter, including Kimbo's record of street fights where someone in that circle challenged him to challenge the myth, and then fought in a certain location after making contact, with bystanders around as evidence. And, please note, that wasn't really no holds barred fighting either, they were sparring with fists at best. You can't say that Jinbo was great, only that his opponents were weaker.

The fights that are highly technical are not that easy to see, because no one is that lucky to pay people to follow all the world's best fighters 24/7, and then take out the TV and film them when they fight (which, by the way, has to be reminded that it has to be master vs. master to be worthwhile to record it, or else it's a waste of videotape), and

watch it, it's just that, there's no need for it! absolutely devalue another tournament format.

What about third-rate fighters or over-the-hill champions? Isn't it all about what you can do for a living? As for such a demeaning attack?

Of course a fighter at the top of his game won't suddenly give up the skills he's already mastered to try ufc just to prove to you that the ufc 'sucks'. But would anyone in their right mind suddenly come up with that kind of logic? Is it to prove to themselves that they are still good at whatever sport they are competing in? Is that how the Americans you know analyze things? It's easy to say that there are specialties, isn't it?

It's like you understand the higher tournament is chess, and the UFC is backgammon, one is a world tournament, one is a game on the desks of elementary school students, is not just a different environment, the backgammon elevated to the international it is a tournament, chess down to the desks of the it is a game, but all are competing intellectually ah. Flag and Go, checkers and chess are all board games, are they comparable? The same reasoning can be proved there are many. Since there is no comparison, how can you say the UFC is a crap event? There has to be a comparison, right? The problem is there isn't, so how did you come to that conclusion?

Tyson has seen UFC fights, and after the fights, he would come to the back of the ring and discuss with the fighters about the fighting techniques, and he himself said that if the fighters were given targeted training, they would be able to get a good ranking in the UFC, which is a very pertinent and objective statement. Who would argue that Tyson's words are a no-brainer? You'll say that it's better to train in a variety of ways than to train in a variety of ways, and agree with you all too much, but what does that have to do with two different modes of competition in the same athletic category? Bruce Lee also abandoned any school to be unique. Can you say that he was less skilled if he practiced a variety of styles? You'd say that Lee is Lee, UFC is UFC, and when all is said and done the viewer gets dizzy, and I'd say that fighting is highly variable, and Bruce Lee fought Wong once in his life, and was exhausted (he was weak in the first place, and his opponents were even weaker than he was). After he became famous, he did not really fight with people, he himself said: I do not know what it is like to hit the fist in the face, so it will hit different materials of sandbags and targets ...... What do we say that his fighting strength is great, we should be based on his martial arts concepts and survival of the video said that he thought more than most of the people in the realm of high and daily practice practicing good, this evaluation is the most important thing. This is the most accurate, pertinent and objective evaluation. How can we be so sure about what he has not done? We Chinese need to learn too much from Americans in terms of rigor of attitude.

Since it exists, there are reasons and values for its existence. The words in philosophy - existence is reasonable.

What's wrong with coming to the UFC if you can't make it? What's wrong with that? To know any competitive event can get Ali and Tyson level of people is certainly a minority, most of the people are all the masses, all into the master, that is still called master? There's no room for comparison. If there was no UFC, where would they be? What would you say about them then? Would you have chased them around and belittled them and questioned why they weren't champions? Is that logical? Just because they're not the best in their field doesn't mean they're not the best elsewhere. Titles and fame are important, but let's not forget that the hard work, sweat and cost of the process is nothing. People are divided into three, six, nine classes, there are masters, there are low hands, the whole world if all the people are the same, then the world what kind of? This hypothesis doesn't occur anyway because it doesn't make sense. I want to know what is wrong with utilizing one's spare time to earn money to support one's family. If you're retired, you have to stay at home with birds and paint and listen to the radio and soak up the sun? Why don't you take a look at the 60-year-olds in the U.S. and China? What are they doing?

The top event is a name that Americans have made for themselves, and they think it's top, just as you think it's top because it's not. Neither is true, really, what's wrong is that you repeatedly call it "crap". The only reason you're promoting it is because you're sick of the Chinese guys chasing ufc all over the internet, right? You're afraid they'll get caught up in it, right? What if they're not afraid of it? What if they really want to have a couple of honorable mentions in the future? What will you do? Do you scold them or teach them a lesson? Blind worship is not desirable, you help to analyze on the line, repeated attacks on this tournament can play a constructive role in promoting help and education? You should be scolded with you, not still scolded with you? Do you want to save them or do you want to hold back to set them up?

Remember you said that the really strong races are the ones where you play the next race long after one race is over, well, what I'm saying is, do you think the army is strong that runs 5km three times a day on cross-country? Or is the army that runs one day a month and 8 hours that day strong (the truth is no army can run for 8 hours straight)? You will say that an army is an army and fighting is fighting, ok, so do you think that the person who has a fight every day is strong? Or people who fight once a month are awesome? You would say that there are a lot of UFC people and most of them don't fight despite there being events on TV every day, yes it's true that very few appear on TV, so don't they sunbathe on the beach in Miami during the fights? Are they messing around with drugs in their private mansions? I think it's more likely that they are training hard and hoping they win the next event, so who's to say I'm wrong.

Saying the most roguish and childish of all, why don't your American wrestling friends go and prove to themselves that those fighters are garbage, you'll say that your friends are really good at what they do and don't care to go and prove it, and you'll say that even if they did, Dana White wouldn't agree to it, so can you tell me why you're not agreeing to it as you're guessing? Your friend wants a high salary? Isn't that why he went to validate that the UFC is full of crap? It's perfectly fine to not get paid to fight all the garbage fighters in it. I don't think that once he gets in the ring and shows a very superior performance and wins easily, it's not enough to prove that he's good, it just means that the UFC fighters suck and it doesn't show him up, so how does he prove his martial arts prowess? Can this complex logic relationship be turned around?

Operating mechanism, it is still a tournament, it does not seem to intend to participate in the Olympic Games, then it really does not need to engage in selection elimination ranking. If you were Dana White you'd have to go the invite route, why would you have to come to the UFC and learn from scratch when the best of the best from other tournaments are getting paid good money? It's all about the money, isn't it? Who would be more noble to pursue the true meaning of fighting? Some people would say that boxing judo muay thai kickboxing judo to come to fight in the UFC will surely all perish! Who saw that? Again, it's just a figment of the imagination. If you really want to open it, you should practice for a while before you see it, in the same way, if you let the UFC to fight boxing judo muay thai taekwondo judo will have to train, it will take much longer, and the result will be pending. What some people are saying is that UFC fighters must necessarily be unsuitable for other competitions, and that all other competitions must necessarily be able to annihilate the UFC is that it? Where's the evidence? The law plays with evidence, so we're better than the law, right? You can't analyze it yourself, and you can't produce convincing evidence, so how can you convince the public?

In the UFC, there are a lot of high-collar fighters, why high age, because the first half of the life is not much, but finally appeared here, that this place is suitable for them. Some would say, so prove that this event is not an elite tournament. That is a name, ask, who do not pay attention to packaging ah, change you will start "the United States relatively close to the actual combat third-rate players small tournament" ah?

Low income, there are so many people to participate in, explain what? Either you are poor and have money to earn, or you want to work hard to get the championship to get more money, what's wrong with that? Who doesn't want to be a champion! To win a championship, you have to pay the sweat and pain, quite proportional ah, the fact that the United States of America in the fierce rivalry of the game of American football a year the most deaths and injuries, the UFC is the least. We reach out and clamor to see the best blood and death of the actual fight, but on the other hand can not do to give the UFC more money, please ask, who else, who will fight to the death just to make you laugh ah! Who wasn't born and raised by their mother and father, how come they deserve to die so that others can watch over the top. The first thing you need to do is to get your hands on the money and then you'll have to pay for it.

The agreement was kept secret for fear that everyone would know how much money the contestants and organizers were getting, and then what? Please someone in the know tell me what this can be used as to show that the UFC is the show. What's confidential is a show and what's not is a fight? What about black market boxing? What category does it fall under? Knowledgable people don't talk with their mouths, give me three-dimensional evidence.

Strictly speaking, who is not an employee? Why is it when it comes to the UFC this is? When it comes to money, most people who have one are not just employees, they are grandchildren.

WWE I've seen, do not love to watch, because it feels fake, in fact, is also fake fight, but the head of the fight more than two action movie stars (do not say star, to avoid lifting the bar).

UFC watched, boxing shadows the most, followed by close fights, all kinds of locks. There was bleeding and unconsciousness. It looked really, really real, and if they were really all acting, then I'd rather be fooled and I'd rather admit I'm blind.

Seeing a lot of people really doesn't make it good, and seeing fewer people likewise doesn't make it bad, does it.

The person who said this is one-dimensional, and there's nothing really, really, really wrong with grabbing this and using it as a way to attack a thing, but it's also really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really true to be able to refute you.

When one evaluates something out of subjective favor or disfavor, there is an equal amount of counter-proof on the opposite side of it.

Early on, it was claimed that there were no rules, but in fact there were rules, and still, if it's in the form of a tournament, there must be rules, otherwise it would be a slaughterhouse for human beings to mutilate themselves! The first thing I'd like to say is that I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that, but I'd like to say that I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that, but I'd like to say that I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do that. I think we are very worthy of learning, at that time China can reflect the essence of the national martial arts tournament, hobbyists can enjoy the visual feast at home, not good? Have to die or be disabled or have to go away with arms and legs still there? I ask, holding this idea to pick on the UFC people you soul deep have ever deep thinking? What if you were asked to organize a so-called real combat tournament?

When I watched the early fights, Keith Hackney, nicknamed "The Giant of the killer," faced an opponent at UFC 3 who was 23 centimeters taller than Emmanuel Yarborough (a very fat black man who was very bulky) and weighed 180 kilograms less than him. There was also a 180 kilogram difference in weight. In this fight, the black man, because of his clumsiness, jumped forward to the ground, and Keith Hackney hit Emmanuel Yarborough's ears with his right fist, but because he couldn't hit the back of his head, and the opponent was facing downward, the only thing that he could hit were the ears on both sides of his head, and a few of his punches landed on the back of his head. It's true that the roundhouses were hit, but they weren't heavy (this isn't because the hitter didn't hit hard enough, but because the angle wasn't in a position where a person would normally be able to throw a punch at full power from his usual stance). Imagine, without gloves and hitting in a non-lethal place, of course the opponent would still be able to stand up after the punch. I want to say that this does not mean that the game is a fake fight, we should see the barehanded fight may be injured hand (who wants to compete with an injury, usually training is wrapped in handbands and gloves, the purpose is not to avoid injuries to participate in the game), and hit the place is not fatal, so the other side is fine. We shouldn't blame the players, we should blame the rules, but the problem is that the rules are not wrong ah, this is the game ah, the game does not have to take into account the player's maximum safety factor it.

The early Chinese martial arts did not pay attention to the gloves, but the problem is that there is no gloves to wear, you let them bring what ah, but not bare hands to fight it.

These are the first time I've ever seen a Chinese martial arts team in the world, and I've never seen one.

Lastly, I would like to say that the UFC is a tournament, the current mixed martial arts tournament on the planet, but also the most comprehensive fighting tournament, it will continue to improve and continue to deepen and continue to perfect, 1986, the United States set up the 'Aviation Aerospace Command', the purpose of which is to see the future of the war will transcend the land, sea and sky, and to be Into the field of space, the start is certainly not now so huge system perfect, are not step by step development to date, the UFC can certainly ah, the Americans are not the highest on the planet fools, right? If they are, what about us Chinese? The best? The UFC is an athletic event, where the players train hard and hope to get good results to earn more money, and all boxing, judo, taekwondo, jiu-jitsu, wrestling, that is, to prove their strength and for the money, the fish and the bear's paw is not good?

There is no guarantee that there won't be a better one in the future, hopefully a better one.

If you love to watch it, you can jump off the stage without being blamed. If you're tired of watching the heavyweights check out the featherweights, if you really don't want to watch it just turn it off.

Jose.aldo, personally I think he is a good talent player, of course, and his opponents to do a comparison and the conclusion. He is gifted, strong desire to attack, clinical state of mind are quite good, fast action, hand-eye-foot and the whole issue of cooperation is also very good, body coordination flexibility is also very good, but his major weakness is that he does not reflect the ground jiu jitsu in the field has been too high, the feeling is that he is more adept at standing fights, or is the opponent to give him a feeling and play so that he seldom use the ground tactics, the specific only his own most clear. The one fight he lost was by "naked choke". He was very frustrated, and I think he'll work on that from now on.

It's okay to love it, it's okay to hate it, it's okay to praise it, it's okay to disparage it. (I wouldn't say: not to disparage. Because disparagement is justified by its very existence, but I'll stand up to you and theorize about it.)

This is kind of a heartfelt message for brother 'East Sea Rakshasa'.

You have practiced fighting for so many years, but more people have not practiced, please allow them to be ignorant of martial arts in the stage of their favorite tournament, please allow them to get more when they do not understand that you give pertinent comments on this, only in this way will they be able to understand what is the real fighting, only in this way they have a good heart of the people who may be able to learn to think about their own problems instead of just listening to the biased beliefs. Only then will they learn to think for themselves and not just listen to what they want to hear.