Art transcends morality debate competition

A complete statement needs to be written by you. Because I don't know which direction you want to start.

The proposition that art transcends morality is a bit difficult, because the thinking orientation of morality and art is very clear. People can't sell morality for a work of art, for example, you are doing performance art and an old woman falls down. Are you going to help or not? Help, morality is greater than art; If you don't help, what's the point even if you win the debate? Therefore, if you want to put forward this proposition, you must not be limited to words.

Not only literally, but also profoundly. First of all, understand what art is and what morality is. Baidu Encyclopedia gives: Morality is a kind of social ideology, and it is the norm and criterion of people's life and behavior. Art, talents and technology have a wide meaning, and then slowly add various high-quality ideas and evolve into a term of beauty, thought and realm. What needs to be clear here is that morality is a code of conduct and an invisible standard, and it needs to be clear about the relationship with quality and conduct, because there may be digressions on the road of debate. And what we call art in our daily life basically refers to objects, such as works of art.

Now let's enter the subjective interpretation of the debate (here a debate begins to conceive the opening statement). According to the explanation of two terms given by Baidu Encyclopedia, morality is a kind of spiritual thought, a code of conduct, and an induction and summary of human social life (morality must be defined literally here. If the other party starts to discuss, it must be hooked back, otherwise the other party will talk about "Tao is extraordinary", so there is no need to argue, because Laozi's Tao. )。 Art, on the other hand, has evolved into a term about beauty, thought and realm by slowly adding various high-quality ideas. This sentence is very important. It can be understood as "art is an expression of human behavior thoughts such as beauty, thought, emotion, code of conduct, attitude towards life and philosophy". Here, the positioning of two nouns is basically clear: morality is a social thought; Art is the expression of ideas, but it is not limited to ideas. You can also express emotions, emotions, opinions and so on.

At this point, you should understand that your argument is to enlarge the connotation of art to the extent that it can include morality. In other words, morality is just an idea. Although long-term inheritance is very important, art is a way to express feelings and convey ideas besides morality. (Be sure to circle the literal explanation of morality and enlarge the artistic expression)

At this point, the argument has basically taken shape, and the second is to talk about "transcendence." What is transcendence? It can be a derogatory comparison, such as the difference between strength and weakness, and the difference between before and after. But here, it needs to express meaning and deeper function. When putting forward the argument, we need to emphasize that transcendence is not who is better than who, but who is more perfect, known and understood to some extent. There is an intuitive cash withdrawal for human acceptance and cognition.

The next step is to turn your thinking to the expression and state of these two nouns in life. Morality, we have planned to delimit it as far as possible within the scope of human code of conduct and human thought, then its daily performance should be to respect the old and love the young, be helpful, be brave and so on (here we can discuss with our teammates: is it professional, patriotic and law-abiding? Personally, I don't think it counts, because I am not dedicated, I am naturally fired; If you don't obey the law, you will naturally be punished by law. There is an external force here, which can be related to later art. Morality virtually limits our own behavior, but it is not mandatory. Because you don't have to save the man who fell into the water or help the old man who fell into the water. Art is not, this concept is a bit broad, the same example: a cup, loved by everyone, then it can be regarded as a work of art; The same is true of a painting; A poem, a song, etc. If it must be positioned, it will be accepted and recognized by the public. This concept is too subjective and can be ignored. This is the problem. Law, morality, music, writing, articles, etc. Can be a concrete form of art. In a sense, law is a work of art; Music, expressing people's feelings; Poetry, the best artistic carrier to record the poet's emotion, can also make people feel the emotion after thousands of years; And there is an idea, which is formed in the process of continuous summary and practice, and is a work of art acquired by human social life for thousands of years. It can be called faith, principle and morality!

Speaking of this, we can make clear the master-slave relationship between morality and art, and then integrate various elements such as law and poetry into the category of art (of course, we can also think so). Then at this time, the relationship between poetry and morality can be diluted. You write poems and songs to express your feelings, which is not directly related to morality, but it is indeed the most direct art form; When you are helping grandma cross the street, it is your good morality that drives you, which can also be regarded as an artistic act. To sum up, the scope of acceptance of art is wider than morality. Therefore, art should surpass morality in promoting human society and influencing human behavior. This is that art transcends morality.

It's up to you to dialectically. That's all I can do.

Attach a few points:

The bad guys are out of moral control, but they long for a Van Gogh painting.

People can ignore the condemnation of moral public opinion, but they are afraid of legal sanctions.

When the ancients used poems and songs to express their feelings directly, they may be just for the sake of love and hate, or they may be worried about the country and the people (here is the moral concept), or they may be just incompetent or greedy, but they all used words and art to express their feelings for hundreds of years.

The morality described in Tao Te Ching is the most comprehensive in the world, but it has been handed down by words and books. In terms of production, books are art; From the perspective of civilization, writing is art.

Finally, although the word art appeared much later than morality, it is indeed a proof of human progress: human beings have found a term called "art", which summarizes people's feelings about all beautiful things, but in the past, there was no such thing.

Case:

The birth of characters created the most important art of mankind and directly distinguished the difference between man and beast.

Printing, compass, papermaking, gunpowder. They are irreplaceable artistic products of the corresponding industries, which have promoted the great wheel of the times in different times.

The appearance of Tang poetry and Song poetry created culture and art and a unique cultural carrier in the world.

The western industrial revolution created industrial art and promoted the progress of society and even the whole world.

All kinds of transportation are also art, which directly drives the pace of society.

It can be said that all inventions are works of art in corresponding fields. And art is a very broad word, very subjective. What you don't like or appreciate is not art, what you like and appreciate can be called art, of course, it is the art you recognize!