What stage has the rural industry in China experienced?

First, the first stage of ancient rural governance in China: the mode of township official system.

The typical form of rural governance in ancient China was the village system, and the village official system was the concrete form and mode in the early stage of the village system, which lasted from Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasties to the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period until the fifteenth year of Emperor Wendi of Sui Dynasty (AD 595).

Second, the second stage of ancient rural governance in China: the mode change from village system to Baojia system and from village official system to vocational service system.

The second stage of rural governance in ancient China was a transition from village system to Baojia system and from township official system to vocational service system, which was roughly in the Sui, Tang and Song Dynasties, that is, from the 16th year of Emperor Wendi (AD 596) to the 3rd year of Xining in Song Shenzong (AD 1070).

Third, the third stage of rural governance in ancient China: the mode of vocational service system.

The third stage of rural governance in ancient China was from Wang Anshi's political reform to Qing Dynasty, and from village system to service system. The official governance system represented by governance power has retreated from township to county level, and county is the grass-roots administrative organization. Below the county level, rural autonomy politics was established with the Baojia system representing imperial power as the carrier, the clan organization embodying clan rights as the basis and the rights of the gentry as the link.

Due to the characteristics of ancient society in China, although its rural governance contained certain autonomy factors, it never developed into real rural local autonomy. With the expansion of kingship in feudal society in China, rural social governance was more and more deeply interfered and controlled by state power, and its autonomy gradually faded. After the Opium War, the power organizations in rural society tended to collapse under the attack of successive civil strife and foreign invasion. After entering the 20th century, the Qing Dynasty was forced to implement the New Deal in Xuantong for five years, and the traditional village system and Baojia system were replaced by local autonomy in villages and towns. Later, although the Kuomintang regime restored the Baojia system, it was immediately abolished by the new regime.

In the historical development of China for thousands of years, rural governance has gone through three stages of historical changes, with village system and Baojia system as the main line, and different governance modes and characteristics have been formed in the concrete practice of past dynasties. The change of ancient rural governance in China reflects the inherent law of rural governance, that is, the intervention of state power in rural social governance should be moderate, and rural governance should not be restricted too much. Only by enhancing autonomy can we maintain our vitality. Under the background of building a new socialist countryside and rural communities, special attention should be paid to the moderate decentralization of state and society to ensure the autonomy of villagers' autonomy.