Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional stories - Do you think King of Glory has contributed to cultural output?

Do you think King of Glory has contributed to cultural output?

The game "King of Glory" virtualizes and abstracts ancient Chinese historical figures, thus bringing them to the public's attention. Historical figures that many people didn't know before can learn a thing or two about them after playing the game, and that's when some people say it's its contribution to cultural output.

But now there's a strange phenomenon: when you see a historical figure in a book that familiarizes you, your first reaction is to name his skills, not his biography or allusions. The occurrence of this kind of chaos, I think it is a kind of deformed cultural output, I will analyze it specifically below!

First, the tampering with historical figures is an act of disrespecting historical culture.

Famous historical figures like Zhuge Liang, Zhen Ji, and Lu Ban were changed beyond recognition in the game. Zhuge Liang was originally a kind of ? feathered fan and spandex? image, but in the game he became a ? Spirit Boy? Then there's the character of Zhen Ji, who was supposed to be a great beauty in history but is a big fat guy in the game, not to mention Lu Ban.

This reckless fabrication and remodeling of character images is disrespectful to history and culture, and instead of giving us a good impression, it damages their position in people's minds even more.

Secondly, it is very unfavorable to children's correct understanding of historical figures.

Why do people study history? It is to understand their ideology and find something from it that can improve themselves. And for children to learn about historical figures is to teach them the inner qualities and virtues of these figures.

But Glory of Kings instills their incorrect images into children's minds, thus making them y entrenched in that impression, which is very detrimental to the development of a child's mind and the cultivation of his or her thoughts.

Third, it exports not culture, but an ? addiction?

The culture that is exported is with positive energy, but The culture of "King of Honor" is not reflected, not only that, it is more addictive, this addiction is very negative, we have seen a lot of related news, you can feel this kind of ? addiction? s terrible.

As you can see, it does not contribute to cultural export. If you have any different opinions, please leave them in the comment section below!