Is it possible to win fencing against soldiers?

Fencing is a sport developed from ancient fencing. It combines elegant movements and flexible tactics, requires athletes to be highly concentrated and well coordinated, and embodies athletes' good movements and agile responses. The introduction of perfect protective clothing and blunt tips in modern fencing events has greatly eliminated the danger of this sport and greatly promoted its spread around the world.

First, the combat coverage is wider, and all three fencing swords are only one-handed swords. The most important difference is that soldiers use weapons with historical weight and center of gravity, while fencing uses lighter and softer weapons with center of gravity completely behind for safety. This creates a problem: the sword is too fast, and the superman sword is the same as kendo. Fencing is a sport, but it doesn't mean that fencing is not "actual combat". In fact, the fencer's sense of distance in exercising and using footwall and sword swing is far better than that of soldiers playing ticket holders. You can say that some actions of the fencer's hands are not "actual combat", for example, because the sword strip is too soft, there will be such operations as throwing the sword. Then there is the problem that the rules lead to frequent double kills, and the consciousness is not practical enough. In terms of rules, the rules of fencing epee are similar to those of soldiers, and can basically be seamlessly connected. Fencers' physical strength and small muscle groups are very suitable for fighters. There is no doubt that fencers crush 99% soldiers in the single-knife event of fighting soldiers. Finally, get rid of the messy long weapons and different weapons. In the context of western swords and swords, I think there is a more suitable word to replace "soldier attack", that is "classical fencing" As far as one-handed sword is concerned, the "soldier attack" of most people in China is actually "classical fencing", which is the earliest form of sports fencing in19th century. And until now, "classical fencing" has not died out in Europe.

Second, fencing is more systematic, competitive and targeted-it is a pure sport. As a martial art, it is to break through and surpass yourself, or to have hobbies or to exercise. As a sport, the pursuit is competitive performance. However, a large number of people who play in circles have always advertised that they can fight.