Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of traditional review class from the perspective of teachers and students.

The traditional review class is an important part for students to prepare for the exam, but its advantages and disadvantages are also worth re-examining. This paper will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of traditional review class from many angles to help readers better understand this teaching method.

Simple and convenient

The traditional review class allows the teacher to explain only according to the textbook, which saves the tedious process of finding information and making courseware, and makes the teaching more focused. This method is simple and convenient, suitable for teaching in large classes, and can effectively use teaching resources.

Rapid economy

Traditional review classes can be taught in large classes, and a large number of contents and skills can be easily taught, which effectively uses teaching resources. This method is economical and fast, and it can make students master knowledge points faster.

Save time and trouble

The traditional review class directly explains the results, which avoids students taking detours in the learning process and saves time for exploration. This way saves time and trouble and enables students to master knowledge points faster.

Absolute authority of teachers

In the traditional review class, teachers, as the "arbiter" of knowledge, have the highest authority on the "correctness" of knowledge, which may limit students' thinking and exploration. This way may make students lack the ability to think independently.

Emphasis on knowledge transfer

Traditional review classes pay attention to imparting knowledge, ignoring students' learning ability, learning methods, emotional development and the formation of values. This way may make students lack the ability of autonomous learning.

Strict control

In the traditional review class, the teacher, as the controller of students' learning, strictly controls all aspects of teaching, making teaching too procedural and modular, lacking flexibility and innovation. This way may make students lack the ability of innovative thinking.