How to understand the re-supervision of supervision

In order to further enrich the learning carrier, broaden the vision of education and training, and improve the political literacy of discipline inspection and supervision cadres at all levels, the Supervision Committee of the County Commission for Discipline Inspection has now opened the official account column of "Discipline Inspection Micro Classroom" WeChat, and regularly selected high-quality content such as discipline inspection and supervision-related business knowledge, warning cases and experience sharing to push. Welcome everyone to actively study and put forward valuable opinions.

"Supervision and re-supervision" means that the discipline inspection and supervision organs re-supervise and re-inspect the lower-level party organizations and functional departments in the process of performing their own supervision and inspection duties, instead of rushing to the front line to replace the party organizations and functional departments for supervision and inspection.

Pre-supervision refers to the behavior of party organizations and functional departments to supervise and inspect specific objects under their jurisdiction, and "re-supervision" refers to the supervision of discipline inspection and supervision organs to lower-level party organizations and functional departments.

"Supervision and re-supervision" is a specific requirement and an effective way to deepen the "three transformations" of discipline inspection and supervision organs, return to party constitution's Fundamentalism, and focus on the main business of supervision, discipline and accountability. It is also an important guarantee to ensure that "supervision" is in place. It is important to check whether the supervisory functional departments perform their supervisory duties in accordance with legal procedures and requirements, whether they implement the supervisory work in accordance with the requirements of the superior's work deployment, and whether they study, report and dispose of major problems in fulfilling their supervisory duties in a timely manner.

Case 1: The discipline inspection and supervision organs of D City, in view of the hot and difficult issues concerned by the masses such as the "Three Disorders" on highways, conducted unannounced visits to the "Three Disorders" on highways through joint transportation, public security and other relevant units, and conducted spot checks on the phenomenon of arbitrary charges in the county's education system. , to carry out special rectification actions, timely deal with the problems found in the inspection and spot check.

Case 2: According to the clue investigation and verification, the discipline inspection and supervision organ of H ordered the municipal public security bureau to seriously deal with the relevant personnel who charged and fined in the process of law enforcement, and thus promoted the local public security system to draw inferences and carry out special governance actions.

In this case, the control of arbitrary charges and fines is the same, and the effect of finding and solving problems is also achieved. However, the practices in the above two places are in sharp contrast, and the role played by discipline inspection and supervision organs is also very different. Which approach is more in line with the requirements of the responsibility orientation of the discipline inspection and supervision organs?

In case one, the discipline inspection and supervision organs in D city violated the duty orientation of the discipline inspection and supervision organs, and put a lot of discipline inspection and supervision forces into the supervision links that should be responsible by the relevant functional departments, resulting in excessive divergence and insufficient focus.

Whenever something goes wrong in a certain field or industry, it is the responsibility of the competent department first. Discipline inspection and supervision organs mainly supervise and even hold accountable the responsible departments and relevant responsible persons, so as to perform their respective duties. In other words, the discipline inspection and supervision organs should focus on "re-supervision of supervision" rather than rushing to the front line. To make an image metaphor, various functional departments are "nails", which are nailed in different positions according to different responsibilities. The discipline inspection and supervision organ is a "hammer", and its duty is to supervise the position of the "nail" and whether the nail is firm. When problems are found, it is necessary to investigate the responsibility of managers for violating the law and dereliction of duty through supervision and inspection and accountability, and urge them to be better and stronger.