What are the disadvantages of traditional rolling processing compared with Hawker energy technology?

1, working principle comparison, Hawke can belong to composite energy processing, with 30,000 high-frequency impacts per second, which makes the metal rheological. Rolling is a rigid and powerful cold extrusion, and its essence is to harden the surface of the workpiece.

2. Compared with the machining effect, Hawke can achieve the mirror effect by one-time machining on the basis of semi-finishing, and the Ra is below Ra0.2, so rolling must be carried out on the basis of finishing, and the improvement range is small, and it can reach Ra0.4 normally.

3. Compared with the surface quality of machining, Hawke can produce a surface strengthening layer, which is in a continuous transition state with the interior of the material without peeling off, which is extremely beneficial to the performance of the parts. Rolling produces a brittle and hard layer on the surface, and the material is discontinuous inside. In severe cases, the surface layer falls off and there are defects such as capillary cracks and scratches.

4. Compared with the applicable scope of machining, Hawke can machine parts with poor rigidity, such as slender rods and thin-walled parts. Rolling can't satisfy the processing of parts with poor rigidity such as slender rods and thin-walled pipe fittings.