Was the bow and arrow manufacturing level in the west and central and western Asia very poor during Alexander's crusade?

This is directly related to the ancient Greek combat tradition. Although there were archers shooting backwards in the movie Troy, there were no archers in the ancient Greek battle. Because of their belief in the moon and Artemis, the Greeks believed that the bow and arrow was sacred for hunting, not a weapon of war, and compared with the power of javelin, the Greeks thought that the power of javelin was much stronger than that of bow and arrow, especially the ancient Greek infantry was mainly heavy infantry. In addition, the bow and arrow technology is limited, so the lethality to infantry is limited, so there is no bow and arrow force in Alexander's army. In the process of Alexander's eastward expedition, the forces of those countries and nationalities are either backward in productivity or have their own unique military composition, such as Persians. Their 5, chariots can be said to be invincible, but it is the destruction of the chariots that eventually leads to the demise of Persia. In these wars, It's all chariot troops against heavy infantry, or light infantry against heavy infantry, and cavalry against heavy infantry, so archers can't play a decisive role in the war.

In addition, according to the history of China before the Qin Dynasty at that time, archers were not commonly used or rarely used. The Qin army's arrow array had a great range and power through years of improvement of bows and crossbows, and most of the troops in the Warring States period were light infantry, so archers could play a huge role.