Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional culture - Which is better, Gaud navigation or Khalid navigation?

Which is better, Gaud navigation or Khalid navigation?

Agree with the views of enthusiastic netizens

I'm in Shanghai, using mobile navigation, and both of these softwares are installed.

In terms of path planning, Khalid is better than Gao De. In this respect, it is not that Khalid is excellent, but that Gao De is poor.

On the address (building) query, Gao De is definitely better than Kai Lide, and it is simply detailed to the extreme. Where to go, just enter the name of the building or the name of the store, and you can almost find it.

I'm installing a 20 12 high-tech version, and there is a full 3d map in the urban area, which is really full 3d, killing Kailide.

Gao De can also connect to the Internet to check the current traffic congestion.

Voice input, Gao De is also good, online, say the address you want to go, and you will find it directly.

Generally speaking, Gao De is powerful.

But, hehe, but it's important. I use Khalid more, and Gaode is just a backup.

In the actual use process, there are generally two situations, which lane to take when there are multiple lanes, and the warning of turning at the intersection is timely. In terms of these two points, Khalid has done a good job, and intersections and multi-lanes are generally real-life picture reminders.

In addition, the path planning is acceptable, and Kelly is usually used.

If you can't find the address by the name of the building, first check the map by other means, such as Gaode, or check the ferry on the Internet, and then check the intersection with Khalid. If you want to be more precise, you can move your destination. I won't move most of the time.

In addition, both maps wrongly marked a one-way street.