Why can China's film The Last Emperor, made by foreigners, win an Oscar, but China's own film can't?

Because foreigners shoot well, they spend a lot of money to improve the quality.

First of all, I think the shooting level and some things taken abroad are better than ours. Foreign countries' achievements and progress in this filming are much better than China's, so this China drama is better than China's. Many foreign films are very impressed by their handling methods and effects. The reason is that their technology has always been high and super-level, so I think this is very important. In a movie, we watch not only the plot, but also the acting skills of the actors and the picture processing of each scene. Some plays with exquisite picture processing are very good choices, which bring more freshness to people. And this "The Last Emperor", foreigners handled this drama very well, so it also gained a lot of fans.

Secondly, I think this director has deeply thought about the historical issues of China, and he vividly described the sadness of the last emperor. In the history of China, Puyi was an emperor, but his miserable life was the focus of many people's attention. But there are not many that can really be described. I think this drama gave the last emperor Puyi a vivid image. The last emperor was not easy either. It was shot live in China with the permission of the government of China. I think this is very rare, and the real scene of this palace is beyond the reach of ordinary dramas. It is normal for the last emperor to win the Oscar. It is a conscience drama in which a lot of efforts have been devoted to the whole process.

China's social environment at that time and Puyi's inner sadness, as an emperor, obviously owned the country, but lived like a puppet.