Do wholesale general profit is how much percent, retail profit is how many

Do wholesale general profit is about ten percent, retail profit is 20-30%. The industry is different, the profit is not the same. I hope to help you

One; the essence of profit is the form of profitability of the enterprise, is the labor achievements of all employees, enterprises for the market to produce quality goods and get profit, compared with surplus value profit is not only qualitatively the same, but also in the amount of equal, the profit is different only, the surplus value is to the variable capital, the profit is for all the costs. Thus, once the gain is transformed into profit, the origin of profit and the material production which it reflects is earned" (The Complete Works of Marx and Engels, vol. 25, p. 56), and thus takes on a great variety of money-making forms. In capitalist society, the essence of profit is: it is a product of capital, completely independent of labor, profit is the life of capital, capital seeks to maximize profit

The value of the commodity is transformed into the cost price + profit (k + p) after the inclusion of the possibility of profit deviating from surplus value. Because profit, as the balance over the cost price, which is less than the value of the commodity, provides the individual capitalist with the possibility of selling the commodity above the cost price and below the value, the realized profit does not correspond quantitatively to the surplus value actually contained in the commodity. Capitalists invariably utilize the difference between the value of the commodity and the cost price as a driving force in market competition. With the competition between the different sectors of production and the free movement of capital, the different special rates of profit are equalized into the average rate of profit or the general rate of profit, which further transforms the profit into the average profit and achieves the same amount of profit for the same amount of capital. In the usual case, average profit and surplus value are not identical in quantity. The amount of average profit is only proportional to the amount of total capital advanced, and not to the amount of live labor at the disposal of the individual capital. This, in turn, creates the objective fact that essentially profit is a product of capital and that it is totally independent of labor, so that the relation of capital to wage labor in terms of earning and being earned is further manifested.

Two; the capitalist mode of production first developed and gained dominance from industry and then gradually extended to agriculture. Since there are two kinds of monopolies in agriculture, namely, the monopoly of the capitalist management of land and the monopoly of the private right to land, it does not have the conditions of free competition as in industry, which prevents the equalization of the rate of profit. The excess profits in agriculture are thus transformed into land rent. The first is the differential rent which arises from the fact that the individual production price of the land product is lower than the social production price; the second is the absolute rent which arises from the fact that the value of the land product exceeds the social production price. The entity of these two kinds of rent, are part of the surplus value created by agricultural wage laborers, which reflects the landowner through the agricultural capitalists *** with the exploitation of agricultural workers in the production relations. But on the surface, land rent is distortedly represented as an increase in the value of the land itself, or as a gift of nature, thus completely concealing the real class relations.

Three; it follows that surplus-value is the intrinsic essence of profit, while profit is the phenomenal form of surplus-value. The more the levels of surplus-value are transformed into profit, and profit into average profit, the more they gradually rise from the abstract to the concrete, and the closer they come to the reality of capitalist society and the consciousness of the parties to the capital relation; in this way they are further and further removed from their own origin or foundation, and thus the capital relation becomes more and more mystified. In order to justify the capitalist system of exploitation, bourgeois economists try to deny the existence of surplus value and the antagonism between capital and wage labor, describing profit as a product of capital itself and as the result of both the production and circulation processes. The so-called trinity formula of profit (interest), labor wages, and land rent is the most blatant and typical defense argument of bourgeois vulgar economics. Marx's theory that profit is a transformed form of surplus value profoundly reveals the essence of profit and its source, as well as the various specific forms of further transformation of profit and the intricate capitalist relations of production and their class manifestations that they embody, thus providing a sharp theoretical weapon for the proletariat and the working people in their revolutionary struggle against the bourgeoisie and for liberation.