Comparison of aeration effect between microporous aeration aerator and leaf energy aerator

Electricity bill comparison 10 mu pond

The total power of five traditional impeller aerators is 7.5 kW.

1 2.2kw microporous aerator saves 5.3kw electricity, saving 83 yuan one day and 2440 yuan in January.

Second: efficient oxygenation

Microporous aeration, because it is three-dimensional aeration from the bottom, makes the upper and lower water bodies exchange convection, breaks the dissolved oxygen thermocline of the water body, and can effectively improve the dissolved oxygen content of the water body.

The disadvantage is that the rapid aeration effect of microporous aeration is not as obvious as that of traditional aerator. Farmers don't open the microporous aerator for a long time, and wait for the fish and shrimp to "float up" before opening it, so they can't aerate quickly in a short time.

Third, restore the self-purification function of water. Microporous aeration is underwater aeration, while traditional impeller aeration is surface aeration. However, the aquaculture water is mainly refractory organic substances such as underwater hypoxia, sludge deposited at the bottom of the water, organic excrement, residual deteriorated feed, etc., which will consume a lot of oxygen. Sufficient micropore aeration will transform it into organic matter dissolved and decomposed by microorganisms, and the self-purification function of water body will be restored.