Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional festivals - What is the British armed forces? Why doesn't the army have the title of "Royal"?

What is the British armed forces? Why doesn't the army have the title of "Royal"?

What is the British armed forces? Why doesn't the army have the title of "Royal"? Come and enjoy it with me next.

The so-called British army is officially called "Her Majesty's Army" in Britain. According to the Constitution, it is also what we call "Imperial Army". This imperial army should not be confused with that small Japanese imperial army. The British imperial army here refers to the British monarch as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. However, the actual management of these three armed forces is the responsibility of the British Ministry of Defence and the National Defence Commission. The so-called three services are the British Army, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy. I'm sure everyone will find it a little strange to say so. I will find that only the air force and navy have been crowned with the title of "royal". Why haven't the regular army been crowned with the title of "royal"? Let's take a look together.

Let's start with the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy. This navy is very important to the island country of Britain. As early as the 9th century AD, Alfred began to develop warships at sea, so the Royal Navy is also a very old service. At the same time, it also established the identity of Britain as a "naval state". At the same time, Britain's Royal Navy is also the most respected among the three armed forces, and is recognized as a senior arm.

The reputation of the Royal Navy can even cover up "Britain". /kloc-during the 0/9th century, countries said that the Royal Navy was not directly called "Royal Navy", but directly called "Royal Navy". The name of this country can be omitted, but the word "royal family" can never be omitted, which shows the importance of the royal family.

Similar to the navy, the Royal Air Force was formerly a British aviation combat unit, which was born in April of 19 18. Because of his outstanding performance during World War I, he was later called "Royal". In the following decades, the Royal Air Force became the largest air force in the world at that time. During the Second World War, it was even more brilliant, defeating the powerful German Air Force at that time and winning a brilliant victory in British air combat.

Compared with the Royal Navy and Air Force, the Army is obviously shabby. Although the army was established earlier than the navy, it is not called "royal". Is it really the British royal family that would do such a stupid thing not to put a bowl of water flat? In fact, however, they didn't want to, because Cromwell and Charles I talked about it.

In fact, the former life of the British army was the parliamentary army, that is, the army led by the famous "lord protector" Cromwell in British history. During the English Civil War, the parliamentary army became Cromwell's main fighting force, and at the same time led the elite cavalry and the round skull party to overthrow the rule of King Charles I, and even pushed Charles I to the guillotine. It was from this time that the enemies of the parliamentary army and the British royal family were forged. Even if the parliamentary army is dissolved and replaced by an army, the restored charles ii will not let you do so, and the British royal family will not give the army the title of "Royal Army" because it is an army that killed its own king.

However, this statement has not been actively recognized by the British royal family so far. According to the British official, the reason why the army was not named "Royal" was mainly because during the British Civil War, in a series of wars between the British monarch and the British Parliament, the army broke its oath and did not support the royal family. So cutting off the king's head is not the main reason, but one of many reasons.

In addition, in the bill of rights of 1689, it is clearly stipulated that in peacetime, the king cannot maintain a regular army. So that is to say, there is a special provision in the law that the British royal family has no right to govern the army in peacetime. Although there is no such provision now, the army has always been "inferior". However, it is worth noting that even if the army is not called royal, it does not prevent individual group armies from being called "royal" within the army.