How did a tech geek enter the headline history circle and win the prize in the cutting-edge writing competition?

Personally, I think it is a good direction to choose to plough deeply in a relatively unpopular historical field when others cluster into hot fields.

First, history is an area that most people will pay attention to, but the degree of attention is different. If someone pays attention, there is room for doing it. Of course, a little loneliness means that the result may be slower. But it is precisely because of its remoteness that its competitiveness may be weak and it is easy to jump out if it is done well.

Second, it has a long history and culture, which is the characteristic and advantage of our nation and country. Promoting cultural self-confidence is an important content and task for us to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. Doing history can meet the needs of the country, which in itself is the right choice in the general direction.

Third, China's long history has nurtured immortal traditional culture, and many historical figures, events and cultural classics are still playing the role of guiding life and work, enlightening business and entrepreneurship, coordinating internal and external relations, and even occupying the commanding heights in the ideological field. Deep ploughing is necessary and valuable. As long as you do it well, do it accurately, and do it grounded, you don't have to worry about no fans.

Fourth, no matter what field you do, there is no absolutely good or absolutely bad conclusion. The key is how to know, how to locate, how to design, how to operate, whether you are attentive and thorough. The field that nobody cares about may be full of popularity because of its characteristics and explosive points; Focusing on the field that everyone loves may disappear from everyone because they have no ideas, no characteristics and no positioning.

First, the headline threshold is too high. I have carefully read many articles shared by original authors, and the general experience is that I focus on my own field and can't copy them. In short, if I am original, I should have at least 400 words, with illustrations matching the content of the article, and the layout is very beautiful. I basically do my best to create according to these experiences, but in fact I have never passed any of them. Because of this, I think the requirements of headlines are too high, so I have never let go;

Second, there are too many headline writers. Although the title is rich in content and suitable for all kinds of people to read, there are countless readers. However, with the various preferential incentives implemented by headlines, the number of creators is also increasing. In order to control the reward support, we have to control the original author;

Third, the original quality is too low. Even if I follow the experience shared by more successful people, I have never formed my own unique experience model, and my creation can't meet the high-quality requirements of headlines, so I won't give it recognition.