How does the triz innovation method differ from traditional methods?

What is the difference between the triz innovation approach and the traditional approach?

The traditional innovation model is:

The direction of traditional innovation is completely determined by personal experience, without the help of any systematic tools, arbitrary, and thus its decision-making risk is also very high;

The traditional way to break the inertia of thinking is mainly through psychological adjustment means (such as relaxing oneself, letting go of one's own free associations, etc.), which is neither reliable nor Stability, the effect is very poor;

Traditional innovation in the knowledge limitations have no way to solve, only rely on personal knowledge accumulation to solve;

Traditional innovation in the traditional method of learning nothing, the so-called method is only trial and error method of a kind, and this method of innovation is very inefficient.

triz innovation methods:

Thinking inertia: solving the problem of invention is advertised as the study of the connection between the human brain and innovation in the field of psychology.

Represent the problem by P. The solution is S, somewhere in the space of solutions, but we don't know where. In order to find the solution, we must first determine the direction that points to the solution. We try to point in one direction (concept 1 and its variables) and then fail. We keep making attempts - but the result is the same. If the solution happens to be in the realm of expert opinion or experience, the number of attempts will be relatively small. But if this is not the case, our search is likely to be difficult.