Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional stories - What are the methods of language course evaluation?

What are the methods of language course evaluation?

(a) Give full play to the multiple functions of language course evaluation

Language course evaluation has a variety of functions such as checking, diagnosis, feedback, motivation, screening and selection, etc., and its purpose is to examine the extent to which

students achieve the objectives of the course,

examine and improve student learning and teacher teaching,

improve the design of the curriculum,

Improving the teaching

process should give full play to the multiple functions of language course evaluation,

with particular attention to its diagnostic,

feedback and motivational functions,

effectively

promoting the development of students.

(2) Appropriate use of a variety of evaluation methods

Formative evaluation focuses on the learning process and is conducive to the timely revelation of problems, timely feedback, and timely improvement of teaching and learning activities. The summative

evaluation focuses on the results of learning,

which is conducive to making a summary conclusion of the teaching activities.

Both formative and summative assessment are

necessary.

The formative assessment should be strengthened,

Attention should be paid to the collection and

accumulation of information that can reflect the students' language learning and development,

which can be done in a variety of ways such as

growth record bag,

recording the process of students' growth.

The daily performance of students in language learning,

should be based on positive evaluations such as praise,

encouragement

and other positive evaluations, using motivational comments and guiding them from the positive side.

The combination of qualitative and quantitative evaluation should be adhered to,

to fully reflect the state and level of students' language learning.

Methods of evaluation include not only paper

pencil tests,

but also various methods such as usual behavioral observations and records,

questionnaires,

interviews and discussions.

Language learning is characterized by

emotional experience and perception,

and more emphasis should be placed on qualitative assessment.

Schools and teachers should analyze students' growth records and test results

and

evaluation results should be presented in a way that, in addition to grades or scores,

can be used to objectively describe the progress of students' language

learning in terms of representative facts and to make recommendations.

Various evaluation methods have their own adaptability,

and differ in their objectivity and profundity.

Therefore,

evaluation design

should focus on feasibility and effectiveness, and try to avoid being cumbersome and to prevent the one-sided pursuit of form.

(C) Focus on the pluralism and interaction of the main body of evaluation

Attention should be paid to the combination of the teacher's evaluation, students' self-evaluation and students' mutual evaluation, to strengthen the students' self-evaluation

value and mutual evaluation,

promoting the students' active learning,

self-reflection.

Evaluation should understand and respect students' self-evaluation and mutual evaluation

.

To respect the individual differences of students,

favor the healthy development of each student.

As needed,

students' parents,

communities,

professionals, etc. can be appropriately involved in the evaluation activities, to strive for more attention and support from the community for students' language learning.

(4) Highlighting the wholeness and comprehensiveness of language course evaluation

Language course evaluation should reflect the wholeness and comprehensiveness of language course objectives, and comprehensively examine students' language literacy. Attention should be paid to

the organic linkage of the five aspects of literacy and writing, reading, writing, oral communication and comprehensive learning, and to the mingling and integration of knowledge and ability,

process and methodology, and affective attitudes and values, avoiding evaluation only in terms of knowledge and skills.

The owner can refer to some.