Online Reading Pros and Cons

In the information age, any cultural people want to completely with the network "delimitation", are almost impossible, because compared with traditional reading, network reading has its irreplaceable advantages:

New content, fast dissemination. Network information dissemination of the fast, has reached the point where the information source can be almost dynamic at the same time. For example, you now urgently need to understand the "Dream of the Red Chamber" research progress and dynamics, the network can provide you with the latest information related to it, and this information, to get through the traditional books, at least in your most "urgent need" of this moment is almost impossible.

The information is comprehensive and easy to access. You want to get some information, just enter a few keywords in the search engine, within a few seconds there will be thousands of related information presented in front of your eyes, for you to choose, screening, selection, such a huge amount of information, if you want to get through the traditional books, that have to run how many libraries, how many materials to flip through, spend how much time and energy ah!

The form of multi-participation. The presentation of network information, from the form of film, audio, graphics, and text, this presentation to a certain extent, a synthesis of literature, music, photography, art and other forms of art, giving us a new, three-dimensional reading enjoyment, but also on a deeper level to meet our reading needs; even if it is the way the text is presented, it also has a variety of genres of traditional books do not usually have the advantage of

In the same theme, you can easily get a narrative text about the ins and outs of an event, and also find a commentary text that analyzes the social impact of the event.

Of course, the drawbacks of online information are obvious:

The information is mixed, and it's hard to tell. A huge amount of network information, there are experts in the authoritative conclusions, there are grassroots a hole in the view; there are calm observation and analysis, there are radical words of anger; there are real dynamic reports, there are false information dissemination; there are noble values guide, there are vulgar deliberate speculation ...... This requires us to practice a pair of first! "eyes of fire", with "gold in the sand" skills, so that the party can comfortably on the mixed information to extract the essence of the rough, false and true, for my use, and not in front of the massive amount of information at a loss, lost their way.